PMID- 10702820 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20000816 LR - 20051117 IS - 0390-6078 (Print) IS - 0390-6078 (Linking) VI - 85 IP - 3 DP - 2000 Mar TI - Eosinophils and C4 predict clinical failure of combination immunotherapy with very low dose subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon in renal cell carcinoma patients. PG - 298-303 AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The clinical and immunologic activities of interleukin-2 (IL-2) in cancer patients have been extensively studied and described; however, in most of these studies, IL-2 was administered by intravenous bolus or continuous infusion, while the immunologic effects of IL-2 given by the subcutaneous (s.c.) route have not yet been well studied. DESIGN AND METHODS: The present study was aimed at evaluating the effects of IL-2, given at very low doses s.c. to patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), on a number of immunologic parameters: number of total lymphocytes, number of CD4-, CD8-, CD25-positive cells, number of natural killer (NK) cells, titers of IL-2 soluble receptor (sIL-2R) and of C4, eosinophils, eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) and eosinophilic protein X (EPX). Finally, a logistic regression model was performed to identify early immunologic parameters that correlate with a favorable or unfavorable treatment outcome. RESULTS: Independently from the mere report of the changes induced by immunotherapy, the analysis showed that, within the pre-treatment model, a large eosinophil number predicts the failure of IL-2 treatment; in contrast, within the post-treatment model, high C4 serum titers and, again, a large number of circulating eosinophils predict immunotherapy failure. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: As far as concerns C4, its negative predictive value could be related to the fact that it is an indirect index of macrophage activation; thus, even though macrophages release substances with antitumor activity, they can also stimulate the release of sIL-2R, which may compete for exogenous IL-2. Some authors have postulated that macrophages may even stimulate tumor cell growth, or impair NK activity. Despite a great amount of uncertainty concerning the role of eosinophils, in our study, blood eosinophilia predicts a poor response to immunotherapy in patients with advanced RCC, thus supporting previous observations from our own group. FAU - Moroni, M AU - Moroni M AD - Falck Division of Oncology, Niguarda-Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy. FAU - Porta, C AU - Porta C FAU - De Amici, M AU - De Amici M FAU - Quaglini, S AU - Quaglini S FAU - Cattabiani, M A AU - Cattabiani MA FAU - Buzio, C AU - Buzio C LA - eng PT - Journal Article PL - Italy TA - Haematologica JT - Haematologica JID - 0417435 RN - 0 (Complement C4) RN - 0 (Interleukin-2) RN - 0 (Receptors, Interleukin-2) RN - 9008-11-1 (Interferons) SB - IM MH - Adult MH - Aged MH - Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnosis/*drug therapy MH - Complement C4/*metabolism MH - Eosinophils/*cytology MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Immunotherapy MH - Injections, Subcutaneous MH - Interferons/*administration & dosage/blood MH - Interleukin-2/*administration & dosage/blood MH - Kidney Neoplasms/diagnosis/*drug therapy MH - Logistic Models MH - Lymphocytes/cytology MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Prognosis MH - Receptors, Interleukin-2/blood MH - Solubility MH - T-Lymphocyte Subsets/cytology MH - Treatment Outcome EDAT- 2000/03/07 09:00 MHDA- 2000/08/19 11:00 CRDT- 2000/03/07 09:00 PHST- 2000/03/07 09:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2000/08/19 11:00 [medline] PHST- 2000/03/07 09:00 [entrez] PST - ppublish SO - Haematologica. 2000 Mar;85(3):298-303.