PMID- 11110739 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20010215 LR - 20190501 IS - 0959-8138 (Print) IS - 1468-5833 (Electronic) IS - 0959-8138 (Linking) VI - 321 IP - 7274 DP - 2000 Dec 9 TI - Problem solving treatment and group psychoeducation for depression: multicentre randomised controlled trial. Outcomes of Depression International Network (ODIN) Group. PG - 1450-4 AB - OBJECTIVES: To determine the acceptability of two psychological interventions for depressed adults in the community and their effect on caseness, symptoms, and subjective function. DESIGN: A pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial, stratified by centre. SETTING: Nine urban and rural communities in Finland, Republic of Ireland, Norway, Spain, and the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: 452 participants aged 18 to 65, identified through a community survey with depressive or adjustment disorders according to the international classification of diseases, 10th revision or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition. INTERVENTIONS: Six individual sessions of problem solving treatment (n=128), eight group sessions of the course on prevention of depression (n=108), and controls (n=189). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Completion rates for each intervention, diagnosis of depression, and depressive symptoms and subjective function. RESULTS: 63% of participants assigned to problem solving and 44% assigned to prevention of depression completed their intervention. The proportion of problem solving participants depressed at six months was 17% less than that for controls, giving a number needed to treat of 6; the mean difference in Beck depression inventory score was -2. 63 (95% confidence interval -4.95 to -0.32), and there were significant improvements in SF-36 scores. For depression prevention, the difference in proportions of depressed participants was 14% (number needed to treat of 7); the mean difference in Beck depression inventory score was -1.50 (-4.16 to 1.17), and there were significant improvements in SF-36 scores. Such differences were not observed at 12 months. Neither specific diagnosis nor treatment with antidepressants affected outcome. CONCLUSIONS: When offered to adults with depressive disorders in the community, problem solving treatment was more acceptable than the course on prevention of depression. Both interventions reduced caseness and improved subjective function. FAU - Dowrick, C AU - Dowrick C AD - Department of Primary Care, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GB. cfd@liv.ac.uk FAU - Dunn, G AU - Dunn G FAU - Ayuso-Mateos, J L AU - Ayuso-Mateos JL FAU - Dalgard, O S AU - Dalgard OS FAU - Page, H AU - Page H FAU - Lehtinen, V AU - Lehtinen V FAU - Casey, P AU - Casey P FAU - Wilkinson, C AU - Wilkinson C FAU - Vazquez-Barquero, J L AU - Vazquez-Barquero JL FAU - Wilkinson, G AU - Wilkinson G LA - eng PT - Clinical Trial PT - Journal Article PT - Multicenter Study PT - Randomized Controlled Trial PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't PL - England TA - BMJ JT - BMJ (Clinical research ed.) JID - 8900488 SB - IM MH - Adolescent MH - Adult MH - Aged MH - Depressive Disorder/*therapy MH - Europe MH - Humans MH - Middle Aged MH - Patient Education as Topic MH - Patient Satisfaction MH - *Problem Solving MH - Psychotherapy/*methods MH - Treatment Outcome PMC - PMC27549 EDAT- 2000/12/09 11:00 MHDA- 2001/03/03 10:01 PMCR- 2000/12/09 CRDT- 2000/12/09 11:00 PHST- 2000/12/09 11:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2001/03/03 10:01 [medline] PHST- 2000/12/09 11:00 [entrez] PHST- 2000/12/09 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 10.1136/bmj.321.7274.1450 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - BMJ. 2000 Dec 9;321(7274):1450-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7274.1450.