PMID- 11902371 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20020404 LR - 20211203 IS - 0002-8223 (Print) IS - 0002-8223 (Linking) VI - 102 IP - 3 DP - 2002 Mar TI - The food intake recording software system is valid among fourth-grade children. PG - 380-5 AB - OBJECTIVES: To assess the validity of the Food Intake Recording Software System (FIRSSt) against observation of school lunch and a 24-hour dietary recall (24hDR); and to test the effects of sequencing, observation and a hair sample as a bogus pipeline on accuracy of dietary report. DESIGN: Six-group design systematically varying sequence of self-report (FIRSSt vs 24hDR), observation of school lunch and hair sample as a bogus pipeline manipulation, with random assignment of participants. SUBJECTS/SETTING: 138 fourth-grade students in 2 elementary schools. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Accuracy of reported food consumption was measured in terms of matches, intrusions, and omissions among the FIRSSt, 24hDR, and as observed at school lunch. Students also completed self-report of performance with FIRSSt. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PERFORMED: t tests, Pearson correlations, analysis of variance, factor analysis. RESULTS: When compared with school lunch observation for one meal, FIRSSt attained 46% match, 24% intrusion and 30% omission rates, while a dietitian-conducted 24hDR obtained 59% match, 17% intrusion, and 24% omission rates. FIRSSt attained 60% match, 15% intrusion, and 24% omission rates against 24hDR for all meals in the previous day. There was no evidence of sequence of assessment affecting accuracy indicators, but there was a weak effect of school lunch observation on percent intrusions. Obtaining a hair sample reduced the omission rate for FIRSSt vs 24hDR and increased the match rate for 24hDR vs observation, thereby enhancing this as a bogus pipeline procedure. Children generally enjoyed completing FIRSSt. Hispanic children were more likely to report problems using FIRSSt. APPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: FIRSSt is somewhat less accurate than a dietitian-conducted 24hDR. However, this lower-cost procedure provides a promising method for assessing diet among children. Observation of consumption at school lunch may be reactive and artificially increase agreement. Obtaining a hair sample as a bogus pipeline may be a valuable technique for enhancing the accuracy of dietary assessment among children. FAU - Baranowski, Tom AU - Baranowski T AD - Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030-2600, USA. FAU - Islam, Noemi AU - Islam N FAU - Baranowski, Janice AU - Baranowski J FAU - Cullen, Karen W AU - Cullen KW FAU - Myres, Dawnell AU - Myres D FAU - Marsh, Tara AU - Marsh T FAU - de, Moor Carl AU - de MC LA - eng GR - CA 75614/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States PT - Clinical Trial PT - Journal Article PT - Randomized Controlled Trial PT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. PT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. PT - Validation Study PL - United States TA - J Am Diet Assoc JT - Journal of the American Dietetic Association JID - 7503061 RN - 0 (Placebos) SB - IM MH - Child MH - Diet Surveys MH - *Eating/physiology/*psychology MH - Female MH - Food Services MH - Hair MH - Hispanic or Latino/psychology MH - Humans MH - Male MH - Mental Recall MH - Nutrition Assessment MH - Placebos MH - Reproducibility of Results MH - Schools MH - Sensitivity and Specificity MH - *Software Validation EDAT- 2002/03/21 10:00 MHDA- 2002/04/18 10:01 CRDT- 2002/03/21 10:00 PHST- 2002/03/21 10:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2002/04/18 10:01 [medline] PHST- 2002/03/21 10:00 [entrez] AID - S0002-8223(02)90088-X [pii] AID - 10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90088-x [doi] PST - ppublish SO - J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Mar;102(3):380-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90088-x.