PMID- 12132939 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20020829 LR - 20200219 IS - 1526-9914 (Electronic) IS - 1526-9914 (Linking) VI - 3 IP - 3 DP - 2002 Summer TI - PTV margin determination in conformal SRT of intracranial lesions. PG - 176-89 AB - The planning target volume (PTV) includes the clinical target volume (CTV) to be irradiated and a margin to account for uncertainties in the treatment process. Uncertainties in miniature multileaf collimator (mMLC) leaf positioning, CT scanner spatial localization, CT-MRI image fusion spatial localization, and Gill-Thomas-Cosman (GTC) relocatable head frame repositioning were quantified for the purpose of determining a minimum PTV margin that still delivers a satisfactory CTV dose. The measured uncertainties were then incorporated into a simple Monte Carlo calculation for evaluation of various margin and fraction combinations. Satisfactory CTV dosimetric criteria were selected to be a minimum CTV dose of 95% of the PTV dose and at least 95% of the CTV receiving 100% of the PTV dose. The measured uncertainties were assumed to be Gaussian distributions. Systematic errors were added linearly and random errors were added in quadrature assuming no correlation to arrive at the total combined error. The Monte Carlo simulation written for this work examined the distribution of cumulative dose volume histograms for a large patient population using various margin and fraction combinations to determine the smallest margin required to meet the established criteria. The program examined 5 and 30 fraction treatments, since those are the only fractionation schemes currently used at our institution. The fractionation schemes were evaluated using no margin, a margin of just the systematic component of the total uncertainty, and a margin of the systematic component plus one standard deviation of the total uncertainty. It was concluded that (i) a margin of the systematic error plus one standard deviation of the total uncertainty is the smallest PTV margin necessary to achieve the established CTV dose criteria, and (ii) it is necessary to determine the uncertainties introduced by the specific equipment and procedures used at each institution since the uncertainties may vary among locations. FAU - Parker, Brent C AU - Parker BC AD - Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. bparker@mdanderson.org FAU - Shiu, Almon S AU - Shiu AS FAU - Maor, Moshe H AU - Maor MH FAU - Lang, Frederick F AU - Lang FF FAU - Liu, H Helen AU - Liu HH FAU - White, R Allen AU - White RA FAU - Antolak, John A AU - Antolak JA LA - eng PT - Journal Article PL - United States TA - J Appl Clin Med Phys JT - Journal of applied clinical medical physics JID - 101089176 SB - IM MH - Brain Neoplasms/*radiotherapy MH - Computer Simulation MH - Dose Fractionation, Radiation MH - Humans MH - Magnetic Resonance Imaging/instrumentation/methods MH - Monte Carlo Method MH - Phantoms, Imaging MH - Radiotherapy Dosage/standards MH - Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/*methods MH - Radiotherapy, Conformal/instrumentation/*methods MH - Reproducibility of Results MH - Software MH - Tomography, X-Ray Computed/instrumentation/methods PMC - PMC5724599 EDAT- 2002/07/23 10:00 MHDA- 2002/08/30 10:01 PMCR- 2002/06/01 CRDT- 2002/07/23 10:00 PHST- 2001/10/15 00:00 [received] PHST- 2002/02/26 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2002/07/23 10:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2002/08/30 10:01 [medline] PHST- 2002/07/23 10:00 [entrez] PHST- 2002/06/01 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - ACM20176 [pii] AID - 10.1120/jacmp.v3i3.2561 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2002 Summer;3(3):176-89. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v3i3.2561.