PMID- 1494138 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 19930310 LR - 20191024 VI - 171 IP - 5 DP - 1992 Dec TI - Processing of frequency-modulated stimuli in the chick auditory cortex analogue: evidence for topographic representations and possible mechanisms of rate and directional sensitivity. PG - 583-600 AB - Responses of units in the auditory forebrain (field L/hyperstriatum ventrale-complex) of awake domestic chicks were studied to frequency-modulated (FM) signals and isointensity tone bursts, presented to the ear contralateral to the recording sites. FM signals, linear frequency sweeps in the range of 50 Hz to 10.25 kHz, differed in the rate of change of frequency (RCF) and in the direction of modulation. The majority of RCF response functions obtained could be classified as predominantly ascending and bell shaped. Best rates of change of frequency (BRCFs), assigned to these functions, covered a range of nearly 3 orders of magnitude. BRCFs of the same units for upward (positive BRCFs) and for downward modulations (negative BRCFs) were correlated. The lowest BRCF encountered among all units for a given isointensity ON-response bandwidth (delta FON) increased as a function of delta FON. delta FON was derived from the responses to tone bursts of various frequencies at 70 dB SPL. As delta FON tended to increase with the best frequency (BF) of units the lowest BRCF encountered among all units for a given BF also increased as a function of BF. Positive and negative BRCFs of a unit were also correlated with the slopes of onset latency-frequency relationships below and above BF, respectively. FM responses were optimal, when the frequency-specific latency differences at a given unit were compensated by the direction and rate of frequency change in the signal. FM-directional sensitivity varied with BF. Most units with BFs below about 2 kHz preferred upward modulations, while those with BFs above 2 kHz preferred downward modulations. Directional preference and sensitivity correlated with asymmetric distributions of inhibitory sidebands around BF, as derived from the analysis of OFF-responses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS) FAU - Heil, P AU - Heil P AD - Institute of Zoology, Technical University Darmstadt, Federal Republic of Germany. FAU - Langner, G AU - Langner G FAU - Scheich, H AU - Scheich H LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't PL - Germany TA - J Comp Physiol A JT - Journal of comparative physiology. A, Sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology JID - 8413199 SB - IM MH - *Acoustic Stimulation MH - Animals MH - Auditory Cortex/*physiology MH - *Brain Mapping MH - Chickens MH - Electrophysiology MH - Orientation/*physiology EDAT- 1992/12/01 00:00 MHDA- 1992/12/01 00:01 CRDT- 1992/12/01 00:00 PHST- 1992/12/01 00:00 [pubmed] PHST- 1992/12/01 00:01 [medline] PHST- 1992/12/01 00:00 [entrez] AID - 10.1007/BF00194107 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - J Comp Physiol A. 1992 Dec;171(5):583-600. doi: 10.1007/BF00194107.