PMID- 15661307 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20050418 LR - 20131121 IS - 0165-0270 (Print) IS - 0165-0270 (Linking) VI - 141 IP - 2 DP - 2005 Feb 15 TI - Analysis of behavioral asymmetries in the elevated plus-maze and in the T-maze. PG - 251-60 AB - When studying functional asymmetries in normal laboratory rats, several behavioral tests have been applied and proven their utility, including turning in rotometers or open-fields, handedness in paw usage, T-maze alternation, and others. Here, we analyzed male Wistar rats in two tests, namely the elevated plus-maze and the T-maze. In these tests, behavioral asymmetries are rather likely to occur, since the animals have to show several types of turns towards the left or right when ambulating through these environments. In a first study using the plus-maze, we provide detailed data on (A) the types of turns which the animals showed when changing their direction within arms (i.e., 180 degrees turns), and (B) the types of turns when proceeding from one arm to an adjacent one (i.e., 90 degrees turns). With respect to asymmetry, we found moderate biases in favor of the right. On the 1st day of plus-maze testing, there was a trend for more rightward turns within arms. On the 2nd day of testing, there was a trend for turns towards the right when alternating between arms of the plus-maze. In a 2nd study, we asked for asymmetries in the plus-maze in animals, which had been treated acutely with the psychostimulatory amphetamine analogue 3,4-methylene-dioxymethamphetamine (MDMA). Psychostimulants drugs, especially amphetamine, have repeatedly been used before in work on functional asymmetry, since they can enhance or reveal asymmetries in normal rats. MDMA had dose-dependent effects on activity, which affected turns within arms, and turns between arms; however, there was only sparse evidence with respect to asymmetry. Interestingly, and if at all, asymmetry was in favor of the right. Finally, we present data for behavior in the T-maze, where we used a spontaneous test version, that is, the animals could explore the maze but had no task to solve. Asymmetries were measured as turns within the start arm (180 degrees), and as left- or rightward turns between arms (90 degrees ) at the T-point of the maze. In both measures, we again obtained evidence for asymmetries in favor of the right. This work supports previous studies showing that the T-maze is suitable to analyze behavioral asymmetries in rats. In addition, it provides new evidence with respect to the elevated plus-maze, indicating that this standard tool of anxiety research may also be useful in research on behavioral asymmetries and their underlying brain mechanisms. Behavioral biases in favor of the right, as shown here, have often been reported before, especially with Wistar rats. Such biases should be taken into account, since they can serve as an approach to study brain/behavior relationships, and since they may affect the outcome of physiological manipulations or behavioral trainings. FAU - Schwarting, Rainer K W AU - Schwarting RK AD - Experimental and Physiological Psychology, Philipps-University of Marburg, Gutenbergstr. 18, 35037 Marburg, Germany. schwarti@staff.uni-marburg.de FAU - Borta, Andreas AU - Borta A LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't PL - Netherlands TA - J Neurosci Methods JT - Journal of neuroscience methods JID - 7905558 RN - 0 (Serotonin Agents) RN - KE1SEN21RM (N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine) SB - IM MH - Analysis of Variance MH - Animals MH - Behavior, Animal/drug effects/*physiology MH - Dose-Response Relationship, Drug MH - Exploratory Behavior/drug effects/*physiology MH - Functional Laterality/physiology MH - Male MH - Maze Learning/classification/drug effects/*physiology MH - N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine/pharmacology MH - Rats MH - Rats, Wistar MH - Reaction Time/drug effects/physiology MH - Serotonin Agents/pharmacology MH - Space Perception/drug effects/*physiology MH - Time Factors EDAT- 2005/01/22 09:00 MHDA- 2005/04/19 09:00 CRDT- 2005/01/22 09:00 PHST- 2004/04/21 00:00 [received] PHST- 2004/06/29 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2004/06/30 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2005/01/22 09:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2005/04/19 09:00 [medline] PHST- 2005/01/22 09:00 [entrez] AID - S0165-0270(04)00240-7 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.06.013 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - J Neurosci Methods. 2005 Feb 15;141(2):251-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.06.013.