PMID- 15960703 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20050719 LR - 20191008 IS - 1360-2276 (Print) IS - 1365-3156 (Electronic) IS - 1360-2276 (Linking) VI - 10 IP - 7 DP - 2005 Jul TI - Rapid assessment of Schistosoma mansoni: the validity, applicability and cost-effectiveness of the Lot Quality Assurance Sampling method in Uganda. PG - 647-58 AB - Rapid and accurate identification of communities at highest risk of morbidity from schistosomiasis is key for sustainable control. Although school questionnaires can effectively and inexpensively identify communities with a high prevalence of Schistosoma haematobium, parasitological screening remains the preferred option for S. mansoni. To help reduce screening costs, we investigated the validity of Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) in classifying schools according to categories of S. mansoni prevalence in Uganda, and explored its applicability and cost-effectiveness. First, we evaluated several sampling plans using computer simulation and then field tested one sampling plan in 34 schools in Uganda. Finally, cost-effectiveness of different screening and control strategies (including mass treatment without prior screening) was determined, and sensitivity analysis undertaken to assess the effect of infection levels and treatment costs. In identifying schools with prevalences > or =50%, computer simulations showed that LQAS had high levels of sensitivity and specificity (>90%) at sample sizes <20. The method also provides an ability to classify communities into three prevalence categories. Field testing showed that LQAS where 15 children were sampled had excellent diagnostic performance (sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 96.4%, positive predictive value: 85.7% and negative predictive value: 92.3%). Screening using LQAS was more cost-effective than mass treating all schools (US$218 vs. US$482/high prevalence school treated). Threshold analysis indicated that parasitological screening and mass treatment would become equivalent for settings where prevalence > or =50% in 75% of schools and for treatment costs of US$0.19 per schoolchild. We conclude that, in Uganda, LQAS provides a rapid, valid and cost-effective method for guiding decision makers in allocating finite resources for the control of schistosomiasis. FAU - Brooker, Simon AU - Brooker S AD - London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. simon.brooker@lshtm.ac.uk FAU - Kabatereine, Narcis B AU - Kabatereine NB FAU - Myatt, Mark AU - Myatt M FAU - Russell Stothard, J AU - Russell Stothard J FAU - Fenwick, Alan AU - Fenwick A LA - eng GR - 073656/Wellcome Trust/United Kingdom PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't PL - England TA - Trop Med Int Health JT - Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH JID - 9610576 SB - IM MH - Adolescent MH - Animals MH - Child MH - Computer Simulation MH - Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods MH - Humans MH - Mass Screening/economics/methods MH - Prevalence MH - Quality Assurance, Health Care/economics/*methods MH - Quality Control MH - Sampling Studies MH - Schistosoma mansoni/isolation & purification MH - Schistosomiasis mansoni/*diagnosis/economics/prevention & control MH - Schools MH - Sensitivity and Specificity MH - Uganda/epidemiology PMC - PMC1975759 MID - UKMS778 OID - NLM: UKMS778 EDAT- 2005/06/18 09:00 MHDA- 2005/07/20 09:00 PMCR- 2007/09/11 CRDT- 2005/06/18 09:00 PHST- 2005/06/18 09:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2005/07/20 09:00 [medline] PHST- 2005/06/18 09:00 [entrez] PHST- 2007/09/11 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - TMI1446 [pii] AID - 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01446.x [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Trop Med Int Health. 2005 Jul;10(7):647-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01446.x.