PMID- 16209970 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20051128 LR - 20220410 IS - 1097-6744 (Electronic) IS - 0002-8703 (Linking) VI - 150 IP - 4 DP - 2005 Oct TI - Monitoring clinical changes in patients with heart failure: a comparison of methods. PG - 707-15 AB - BACKGROUND: Although monitoring the clinical status of patients with heart failure rests at the core of clinical medicine, the ability of different techniques to reflect clinical change has not been evaluated. This study sought to describe changes in various measures of disease status associated with gradations of clinical change. METHODS: A prospective, 14-center cohort of 476 outpatients was assessed at baseline and 6 +/- 2 weeks to compare changes in 7 heart failure measures with clinically observed change. Measures included health status instruments (the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ], Short Form-12, and EQ-5D), physician-assessed functional class (New York Heart Association [NYHA]), an exercise test (6-minute walk), patient weight, and a biomarker (B-type natriuretic peptide). Cardiologists, blinded to all measures except weight and NYHA, categorized clinical change ranging from large deterioration to large improvement. RESULTS: The KCCQ, NYHA, and 6-minute walk test were most sensitive to clinical change. For patients with large, moderate, and small deteriorations, the KCCQ decreased by 25 +/- 16, 17 +/- 14, and 5.3 +/- 11 points, respectively. For patients with small, moderate, and large improvements, the KCCQ increased by 5.7 +/- 16, 10.5 +/- 16, and 22.3 +/- 16 points, respectively (P < .01 for all compared with the no change group). New York Heart Association and 6-minute walk distance were significantly different for those with moderate and large changes (P < .05) but neither revealed a difference between those with small versus no clinical deterioration. The KCCQ had the highest c statistic for monitoring individual patients, followed by NYHA and 6-minute walk. CONCLUSION: The KCCQ, followed by the NYHA and the 6-minute walk test, most accurately reflected clinical change in patients with heart failure. FAU - Spertus, John AU - Spertus J AD - Mid America Heart Institute, Saint Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA. spertusj@umkc.edu FAU - Peterson, Eric AU - Peterson E FAU - Conard, Mark W AU - Conard MW FAU - Heidenreich, Paul A AU - Heidenreich PA FAU - Krumholz, Harlan M AU - Krumholz HM FAU - Jones, Philip AU - Jones P FAU - McCullough, Peter A AU - McCullough PA FAU - Pina, Ileana AU - Pina I FAU - Tooley, Joseph AU - Tooley J FAU - Weintraub, William S AU - Weintraub WS FAU - Rumsfeld, John S AU - Rumsfeld JS CN - Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Consortium LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article PT - Multicenter Study PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't PL - United States TA - Am Heart J JT - American heart journal JID - 0370465 SB - IM CIN - Am Heart J. 2006 Jun;151(6):e5; author reply e7. PMID: 16781209 MH - Diagnostic Tests, Routine MH - Female MH - Follow-Up Studies MH - Heart Failure/complications/*diagnosis/physiopathology MH - Humans MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Prospective Studies MH - Sensitivity and Specificity MH - Surveys and Questionnaires MH - Time Factors EDAT- 2005/10/08 09:00 MHDA- 2005/12/13 09:00 CRDT- 2005/10/08 09:00 PHST- 2004/09/01 00:00 [received] PHST- 2004/12/09 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2005/10/08 09:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2005/12/13 09:00 [medline] PHST- 2005/10/08 09:00 [entrez] AID - S0002-8703(04)00906-8 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.12.010 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Am Heart J. 2005 Oct;150(4):707-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.12.010.