PMID- 16368450 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20060320 LR - 20220408 IS - 0149-2918 (Print) IS - 0149-2918 (Linking) VI - 27 IP - 11 DP - 2005 Nov TI - Comparison of fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide 40/12.5 mg and 80/12.5 mg and a fixed-dose combination of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide 50/12.5 mg in mild to moderate essential hypertension: pooled analysis of two multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point (PROBE) trials. PG - 1795-805 AB - BACKGROUND: High incidences of cardiovascular events coincide with a surge in blood pressure (BP) that occurs in the early morning hours at the time of arousal. Thus, control of BP at this time of day, using oral fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) as required, is important in reducing cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this analysis was to compare the antihypertensive efficacy in the early morning hours and tolerability of oral FDCs of telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) (40/12.5 mg [T40/H12.5] and 80/12.5 mg [T80/H12.5]) versus a low-dose FDC of losartan 50 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg (L50/H12.5). METHODS: Data from 2 similarly designed prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point (PROBE) studies were pooled and analyzed. The studies were conducted at 72 centers across the United States, and 70 centers in Canada, Europe (9 countries), and the Philippines. Adult male and female patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (24-hour mean ambulatory diastolic BP [DBP], > or =85 mm Hg; seated cuff DBP, 90-109 mm Hg) were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to receive T40/H12.5, L50/H12.5, or T80/H12.5, QD (morning) for 6 weeks. Antihypertensive efficacy was assessed using 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and cuff sphygmomanometry at trough, performed at baseline and on completion of active treatment. The primary end point was the reduction from baseline in mean ambulatory DBP over the last 6 hours of the dosing interval. Secondary end points included other ABPM- and clinic-derived changes in DBP and systolic BP (SBP), and control and response rates (SBP response defined as 24-hour mean SBP <130 mm Hg and/or reduction from baseline > or =10 mm Hg; DBP response defined as 24-hour mean DBP <85 mm Hg or reduction from baseline > or =10 mm Hg; DBP control defined as 24-hour mean DBP <85 mm Hg). Tolerability was assessed using patient interview, spontaneous reporting, and clinical evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 1402 patients were enrolled(876 men, 525 women; mean [SD] age, 53.1 [9.9] years) (T40/H12.5, n = 517; L50/H12.5, n = 518; and T80/H12.5, n = 367). With T40/H12.5, the mean reduction in last-6-hour mean ambulatory DBP was 1.8 mm Hg greater compared with that achieved with L50/H12.5 (-11.3 [0.4] vs -9.4 [0.4] mm Hg; P < 0.001), and with T80/H12.5, the mean reduction was 2.6 mm Hg greater compared with that achieved with L50/H12.5 (-12.0 [0.4] vs -9.4 [0.4] mm Hg; P < 0.001). Analysis of secondary end points found that greater BP reduction occurred with T40/H12.5 and T80/H12.5 compared with L50/H12.5. ABPM SBP control and response rates were similar between the 3 groups, but the ABPM DBP control and response rates were significantly higher with T80/H12.5 compared with L50/H12.5 (46.6% vs 34.0% [P < 0.002] and 69.4% vs 55.0% [P < 0.001], respectively). Clinic SBP and DBP control and response rates were higher with T40/H12.5 and T80/H12.5 compared with L50/H12.5 (SBP response, 80.4% and 80.8% vs 68.5% [both, P < 0.001]; DBP response, 66.1% and 67.4% vs 54.4% [both, P < 0.001]; DBP control, 56.5% and 56.4% vs 44.1% [both, P < 0.001] ). The 2 most commonly recorded adverse events (AEs) were headache (T40/H12.5, 2.9%; L50/H12.5, 3.3%; and T80/H12.5, 3.0%) and dizziness (1.2%, 2.1%, and 3.0%, respectively). Most AEs were mild to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pooled analysis of2 PROBE studies in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension suggest that T40/H12.5 and T80/H12.5 conferred greater DBP and SBP control compared with low-dose L50/H12.5, including during the last 6 hours of the dosing interval. All 3 treatments were well tolerated. FAU - Lacourciere, Yves AU - Lacourciere Y AD - Unite d'hypertension, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite Laval, Universite Laval, 2705 Boulevard Laurier (S-120), Sainte-Foy, Quebec G1V 4G2, Quebec, Canada. YvesLacourciere@crchul.ulaval.ca FAU - Neutel, Joel M AU - Neutel JM FAU - Schumacher, Helmut AU - Schumacher H LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article PT - Meta-Analysis PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't PL - United States TA - Clin Ther JT - Clinical therapeutics JID - 7706726 RN - 0 (Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers) RN - 0 (Antihypertensive Agents) RN - 0 (Benzimidazoles) RN - 0 (Benzoates) RN - 0 (Diuretics) RN - 0 (Drug Combinations) RN - 0J48LPH2TH (Hydrochlorothiazide) RN - JMS50MPO89 (Losartan) RN - U5SYW473RQ (Telmisartan) SB - IM MH - Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/administration & dosage/therapeutic use MH - Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use MH - Benzimidazoles/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use MH - Benzoates/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use MH - Blood Pressure MH - Diuretics/administration & dosage/therapeutic use MH - Drug Combinations MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Hydrochlorothiazide/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use MH - Hypertension/*drug therapy MH - Losartan/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Multicenter Studies as Topic MH - Prospective Studies MH - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic MH - Telmisartan EDAT- 2005/12/22 09:00 MHDA- 2006/03/21 09:00 CRDT- 2005/12/22 09:00 PHST- 2005/09/30 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2005/12/22 09:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2006/03/21 09:00 [medline] PHST- 2005/12/22 09:00 [entrez] AID - S0149-2918(05)00293-6 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.11.014 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Clin Ther. 2005 Nov;27(11):1795-805. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.11.014.