PMID- 16563186 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20060731 LR - 20181113 IS - 1474-760X (Electronic) IS - 1465-6906 (Print) IS - 1474-7596 (Linking) VI - 7 IP - 3 DP - 2006 TI - Phylogenetic and structural analysis of centromeric DNA and kinetochore proteins. PG - R23 AB - BACKGROUND: Kinetochores are large multi-protein structures that assemble on centromeric DNA (CEN DNA) and mediate the binding of chromosomes to microtubules. Comprising 125 base-pairs of CEN DNA and 70 or more protein components, Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochores are among the best understood. In contrast, most fungal, plant and animal cells assemble kinetochores on CENs that are longer and more complex, raising the question of whether kinetochore architecture has been conserved through evolution, despite considerable divergence in CEN sequence. RESULTS: Using computational approaches, ranging from sequence similarity searches to hidden Markov model-based modeling, we show that organisms with CENs resembling those in S. cerevisiae (point CENs) are very closely related and that all contain a set of 11 kinetochore proteins not found in organisms with complex CENs. Conversely, organisms with complex CENs (regional CENs) contain proteins seemingly absent from point-CEN organisms. However, at least three quarters of known kinetochore proteins are present in all fungi regardless of CEN organization. At least six of these proteins have previously unidentified human orthologs. When fungi and metazoa are compared, almost all have kinetochores constructed around Spc105 and three conserved multi-protein linker complexes (MIND, COMA, and the NDC80 complex). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that critical structural features of kinetochores have been well conserved from yeast to man. Surprisingly, phylogenetic analysis reveals that human kinetochore proteins are as similar in sequence to their yeast counterparts as to presumptive Drosophila melanogaster or Caenorhabditis elegans orthologs. This finding is consistent with evidence that kinetochore proteins have evolved very rapidly relative to components of other complex cellular structures. FAU - Meraldi, Patrick AU - Meraldi P AD - Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. FAU - McAinsh, Andrew D AU - McAinsh AD FAU - Rheinbay, Esther AU - Rheinbay E FAU - Sorger, Peter K AU - Sorger PK LA - eng GR - R01 CA084179/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States GR - R01 GM051464/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States GR - CA84179/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States GR - GM51464/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't DEP - 20060322 PL - England TA - Genome Biol JT - Genome biology JID - 100960660 RN - 0 (DNA, Fungal) RN - 0 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins) SB - IM MH - Centromere/*genetics MH - DNA Replication MH - DNA, Fungal/classification/*genetics MH - Kinetochores/*physiology MH - Phylogeny MH - Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics MH - Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics PMC - PMC1557759 EDAT- 2006/03/28 09:00 MHDA- 2006/08/01 09:00 PMCR- 2006/03/22 CRDT- 2006/03/28 09:00 PHST- 2005/10/19 00:00 [received] PHST- 2005/12/19 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2006/02/24 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2006/03/28 09:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2006/08/01 09:00 [medline] PHST- 2006/03/28 09:00 [entrez] PHST- 2006/03/22 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - gb-2006-7-3-r23 [pii] AID - 10.1186/gb-2006-7-3-r23 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Genome Biol. 2006;7(3):R23. doi: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-3-r23. Epub 2006 Mar 22.