PMID- 16900816 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20060912 LR - 20220317 IS - 0893-2174 (Print) IS - 0893-2174 (Linking) VI - 19 IP - 4 DP - 2006 Jul-Aug TI - Influence of implant and conventional prostheses on satisfaction and quality of life: A literature review. Part 2: Qualitative analysis and evaluation of the studies. PG - 339-48 AB - PURPOSE: To review the influence of prosthodontic and dental implant treatment on patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (OHQOL) based on a systematic search of the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out for articles published between 1960 and February 2003. Details of the search process and results were reported in Part 1 of the study (Int J Prosthodont2004;17:83-93). The included studies were categorized and evaluated according to their level of evidence, following the guidelines of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. The characteristics and content of the studies were analyzed and tabulated. RESULTS: Among the 114 included studies, there were 76 publications reaching evidence level III. The results showed that the effects of compromised oral health are not limited to traditional clinical aspects, but can considerably affect patients in various activities of daily life. Twenty-four of the 38 investigations with evidence levels I and II dealt with implant stabilization of complete mandibular prostheses, comparing implant prostheses to conventional complete dentures. Fully edentulous patients experience negative impacts on OHQOL from their condition. They benefit significantly from the use of dental implants to support mandibular prostheses. However, support by more than 2 implants does not appear to further significantly increase patient satisfaction and OHQOL. CONCLUSIONS: To date, research in the field of patient-based outcomes has concentrated on dental implant treatment for the edentulous patient. Other prosthetic treatments such as single crowns, fixed and removable partial dentures, or further treatment concepts (eg, the shortened dental arch concept) are not well represented. The use of patient-centered outcome measures can help to find an individual, patient-oriented prosthetic solution. FAU - Strassburger, Christoph AU - Strassburger C AD - Preclinical Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. FAU - Kerschbaum, Thomas AU - Kerschbaum T FAU - Heydecke, Guido AU - Heydecke G LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Review PL - United States TA - Int J Prosthodont JT - The International journal of prosthodontics JID - 8900938 RN - 0 (Dental Implants) MH - Activities of Daily Living MH - *Dental Implants MH - *Dental Prosthesis MH - Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported MH - Denture, Complete MH - Humans MH - Oral Health MH - *Patient Satisfaction MH - *Quality of Life RF - 135 EDAT- 2006/08/12 09:00 MHDA- 2006/09/13 09:00 CRDT- 2006/08/12 09:00 PHST- 2006/08/12 09:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2006/09/13 09:00 [medline] PHST- 2006/08/12 09:00 [entrez] PST - ppublish SO - Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Jul-Aug;19(4):339-48.