PMID- 17266013
OWN - NLM
STAT- MEDLINE
DCOM- 20070306
LR  - 20220410
IS  - 1049-8931 (Print)
IS  - 1557-0657 (Electronic)
IS  - 1049-8931 (Linking)
VI  - 15
IP  - 4
DP  - 2006
TI  - Concordance of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0 (CIDI 
      3.0) with standardized clinical assessments in the WHO World Mental Health 
      surveys.
PG  - 167-80
AB  - The DSM-IV diagnoses generated by the fully structured lay-administered Composite 
      International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) in the WHO World Mental 
      Health (WMH) surveys were compared to diagnoses based on follow-up interviews 
      with the clinician-administered non-patient edition of the Structured Clinical 
      Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) in probability subsamples of the WMH surveys in 
      France, Italy, Spain, and the US. CIDI cases were oversampled. The clinical 
      reappraisal samples were weighted to adjust for this oversampling. Separate 
      samples were assessed for lifetime and 12-month prevalence. Moderate to good 
      individual-level CIDI-SCID concordance was found for lifetime prevalence 
      estimates of most disorders. The area under the ROC curve (AUC, a measure of 
      classification accuracy that is not influenced by disorder prevalence) was 0.76 
      for the dichotomous classification of having any of the lifetime DSM-IV anxiety, 
      mood and substance disorders assessed in the surveys and in the range 0.62-0.93 
      for individual disorders, with an inter-quartile range (IQR) of 0.71-0.86. 
      Concordance increased when CIDI symptom-level data were added to predict SCID 
      diagnoses in logistic regression equations. AUC for individual disorders in these 
      equations was in the range 0.74-0.99, with an IQR of 0.87-0.96. CIDI lifetime 
      prevalence estimates were generally conservative relative to SCID estimates. 
      CIDI-SCID concordance for 12-month prevalence estimates could be studied 
      powerfully only for two disorder classes, any anxiety disorder (AUC = 0.88) and 
      any mood disorder (AUC = 0.83). As with lifetime prevalence, 12-month concordance 
      improved when CIDI symptom-level data were added to predict SCID diagnoses. CIDI 
      12-month prevalence estimates were unbiased relative to SCID estimates. The 
      validity of the CIDI is likely to be under-estimated in these comparisons due to 
      the fact that the reliability of the SCID diagnoses, which is presumably less 
      than perfect, sets a ceiling on maximum CIDI-SCID concordance.
FAU - Haro, Josep Maria
AU  - Haro JM
FAU - Arbabzadeh-Bouchez, Saena
AU  - Arbabzadeh-Bouchez S
FAU - Brugha, Traolach S
AU  - Brugha TS
FAU - de Girolamo, Giovanni
AU  - de Girolamo G
FAU - Guyer, Margaret E
AU  - Guyer ME
FAU - Jin, Robert
AU  - Jin R
FAU - Lepine, Jean Pierre
AU  - Lepine JP
FAU - Mazzi, Fausto
AU  - Mazzi F
FAU - Reneses, Blanca
AU  - Reneses B
FAU - Vilagut, Gemma
AU  - Vilagut G
FAU - Sampson, Nancy A
AU  - Sampson NA
FAU - Kessler, Ronald C
AU  - Kessler RC
LA  - eng
GR  - R01-TW006481/TW/FIC NIH HHS/United States
GR  - U01-MH60220/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
PT  - Editorial
PT  - Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
PT  - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PL  - United States
TA  - Int J Methods Psychiatr Res
JT  - International journal of methods in psychiatric research
JID - 9111433
SB  - IM
MH  - Cross-Cultural Comparison
MH  - Data Collection
MH  - *Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
MH  - Female
MH  - *Health Surveys
MH  - Humans
MH  - Interview, Psychological/*methods
MH  - Male
MH  - Mental Disorders/*diagnosis/epidemiology
MH  - Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/*standards
MH  - ROC Curve
MH  - *World Health Organization
PMC - PMC6878271
EDAT- 2007/02/03 09:00
MHDA- 2007/03/07 09:00
PMCR- 2006/11/23
CRDT- 2007/02/03 09:00
PHST- 2007/02/03 09:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2007/03/07 09:00 [medline]
PHST- 2007/02/03 09:00 [entrez]
PHST- 2006/11/23 00:00 [pmc-release]
AID - MPR196 [pii]
AID - 10.1002/mpr.196 [doi]
PST - ppublish
SO  - Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2006;15(4):167-80. doi: 10.1002/mpr.196.