PMID- 17586413 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20071101 LR - 20220408 IS - 0895-7061 (Print) IS - 0895-7061 (Linking) VI - 20 IP - 7 DP - 2007 Jul TI - Effects of carvedilol versus metoprolol on endothelial function and oxidative stress in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. PG - 777-83 AB - BACKGROUND: Data suggest that carvedilol possesses antioxidant properties that might provide vascular protection. We sought to compare the effects of carvedilol and metoprolol tartrate on endothelial function and oxidative stress in a head-to-head trial. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension were randomized to receive either carvedilol (n = 16) or metoprolol (n = 18) in addition to their current antihypertensive medications for 5 months. The following variables were measured pre- and posttreatment: blood pressure, fasting glucose and insulin, insulin resistance by homeostasis-model assessment, hemoglobin A1c, lipids, C-reactive protein (CRP), 8-isoprostane, asymmetric dimethylarginine, oxidized LDL cholesterol, ultrasound assessment of brachial-artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), nitroglycerin-induced endothelium-independent dilation (EID), brachial and carotid artery distension, distensibility and compliance, and carotid artery intima-media thickness (cIMT). RESULTS: Both carvedilol and metoprolol treatment resulted in significant and similar decreases in systolic (P < .05) and diastolic (P < .0001) blood pressure. Compared with metoprolol, carvedilol significantly improved FMD (P < .001). No differences between groups were noted for any of the glycemic or lipid variables except for HDL cholesterol, which significantly decreased (P < .05) in the metoprolol group compared with the carvedilol group. No differences were observed between groups for CRP, the markers of oxidative stress, EID, arterial stiffness, or cIMT. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with metoprolol, carvedilol significantly improves endothelial function in patients with T2DM. Changes in glycemic control and oxidative stress do not seem to explain the observed improvements in FMD, which suggests that other mechanisms may be involved. FAU - Bank, Alan J AU - Bank AJ AD - Department of Research, St. Paul Heart Clinic, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. abank@stphc.com FAU - Kelly, Aaron S AU - Kelly AS FAU - Thelen, Andrea M AU - Thelen AM FAU - Kaiser, Daniel R AU - Kaiser DR FAU - Gonzalez-Campoy, J Michael AU - Gonzalez-Campoy JM LA - eng SI - ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00123604 PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article PT - Randomized Controlled Trial PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't PL - United States TA - Am J Hypertens JT - American journal of hypertension JID - 8803676 RN - 0 (Antihypertensive Agents) RN - 0 (Carbazoles) RN - 0 (Propanolamines) RN - 0K47UL67F2 (Carvedilol) RN - GEB06NHM23 (Metoprolol) SB - IM MH - Aged MH - Antihypertensive Agents/*therapeutic use MH - Carbazoles/*therapeutic use MH - Carvedilol MH - Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications/*physiopathology MH - Double-Blind Method MH - Endothelium, Vascular/*drug effects/physiology MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Hypertension/complications/*drug therapy MH - Male MH - Metoprolol/*therapeutic use MH - Middle Aged MH - Oxidative Stress/*drug effects MH - Propanolamines/*therapeutic use EDAT- 2007/06/26 09:00 MHDA- 2007/11/02 09:00 CRDT- 2007/06/26 09:00 PHST- 2006/12/11 00:00 [received] PHST- 2007/01/01 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2007/01/25 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2007/06/26 09:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2007/11/02 09:00 [medline] PHST- 2007/06/26 09:00 [entrez] AID - S0895-7061(07)00091-X [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2007.01.019 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Am J Hypertens. 2007 Jul;20(7):777-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2007.01.019.