PMID- 18211128 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20080404 LR - 20190902 IS - 1555-2101 (Electronic) IS - 0160-6689 (Linking) VI - 69 IP - 2 DP - 2008 Feb TI - A 1-year pilot study of vagus nerve stimulation in treatment-resistant rapid-cycling bipolar disorder. PG - 183-9 AB - OBJECTIVE: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) appears to be an effective treatment option for patients with treatment-resistant unipolar and bipolar depression. The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of VNS in a group of patients with treatment-resistant rapid-cycling bipolar disorder (RCBD) who were excluded from previous trials. METHOD: Nine outpatients with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of treatment-resistant RCBD were treated for 40 weeks with open-label VNS. The first patient was enrolled in June 2001, and the last patient completed the study in July 2005. Patients recorded their depression and mania mood symptoms on a daily basis throughout the study using the National Institute of Mental Health prospective life charting methodology and daily mood ratings. Patients were assessed every 2 weeks during the 2-month baseline period before device activation, every 2 weeks for the remaining 40 weeks of the study, and at the end of the study with the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-24), the 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale, the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale, and the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR-30). Any adverse events or device complications were also recorded at each visit. The prospective life charts were analyzed by calculating the area under the curve. Statistical analysis was performed with a mixed-model repeated-measures regression analysis for repeated measures of the various rating scales. Significant p values were < or = .05. RESULTS: Over the 12-month study period, VNS was associated with a 38.1% mean improvement in overall illness as compared to baseline (p = .012), as well as significant reductions in symptoms as measured by the HAM-D-24 (p = .043), MADRS (p = .003), CGI (p = .013), and GAF (p < .001) rating scales. Common adverse events were voice alteration during stimulation and hoarseness. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that VNS may be an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with treatment-resistant RCBD. Currently, no comparison is available in the literature. Larger randomized trials are needed to verify these findings. FAU - Marangell, Lauren B AU - Marangell LB AD - Mood Disorders Center, Menninger Department of Psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine, and Department of Veterans Affairs, Houston, Texas, USA. drlauren@lilly.com FAU - Suppes, Trisha AU - Suppes T FAU - Zboyan, Holly A AU - Zboyan HA FAU - Prashad, Sandhya J AU - Prashad SJ FAU - Fischer, Grace AU - Fischer G FAU - Snow, Diane AU - Snow D FAU - Sureddi, Suresh AU - Sureddi S FAU - Allen, John C AU - Allen JC LA - eng PT - Clinical Trial PT - Journal Article PT - Multicenter Study PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't PL - United States TA - J Clin Psychiatry JT - The Journal of clinical psychiatry JID - 7801243 RN - 0 (Antimanic Agents) SB - IM MH - Adult MH - Age of Onset MH - Antimanic Agents/therapeutic use MH - Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy/*therapy MH - Electric Stimulation Therapy/adverse effects/*methods MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Longitudinal Studies MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Pilot Projects MH - Psychiatric Status Rating Scales MH - Time Factors MH - Treatment Outcome MH - *Vagus Nerve EDAT- 2008/01/24 09:00 MHDA- 2008/04/05 09:00 CRDT- 2008/01/24 09:00 PHST- 2008/01/24 09:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2008/04/05 09:00 [medline] PHST- 2008/01/24 09:00 [entrez] AID - ej07m03183 [pii] AID - 10.4088/jcp.v69n0203 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;69(2):183-9. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0203.