PMID- 18394814 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20080624 LR - 20191210 IS - 0360-3016 (Print) IS - 0360-3016 (Linking) VI - 71 IP - 2 DP - 2008 Jun 1 TI - Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and CT for delineation of lumpectomy cavity for partial breast irradiation. PG - 595-602 LID - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.004 [doi] AB - PURPOSE: The success of partial breast irradiation critically depends on proper target localization. We examined the use of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/computed tomography (CT) for improved lumpectomy cavity (LC) delineation and treatment planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twelve breast cancer patients underwent FDG-PET/CT on a GE Discovery scanner with a median time from surgery to PET/CT of 49 days. The LC was contoured on the CT scan by a radiation oncologist and, together with a nuclear medicine physician, on the PET/CT scan. The volumes were calculated and compared in each patient. Treatment planning target volumes (PTVs) were calculated by expanding the margin 2 cm beyond the LC, maintaining a 5-mm margin from the skin and chest wall, and the treatment plans were evaluated. In addition, a study with a patient-like phantom was conducted to evaluate the effect that the window/level settings might have on contouring. RESULTS: The margin of the LC was well visualized on all FDG-PET images. The phantom results indicated that the difference between the known volume and the FDG-PET-delineated volume was <10%, regardless of the window/level settings. The PET/CT volumes were larger than the CT volumes in all cases (median volume ratio, 1.68; range, 1.24-2.45; p = 0.004). The PET/CT-based PTVs were also larger than the CT-based PTV (median volume ratio, 1.16; range, 1.08-1.64; p = 0.006). In 9 of 12 patients, a CT-based treatment plan did not provide adequate coverage of the PET/CT-based PTV (99% of the PTV received <95% of the prescribed dose), resulting in substantial cold spots in some plans. In these cases, treatment plans were generated which were specifically designed to cover the larger PET/CT-based PTV. Although these plans showed an increased dose to the normal tissues, the increases were modest: the non-target breast volume receiving > or =50 Gy, lung volume receiving > or =30 Gy, and heart volume receiving > or =5 Gy increased by 5.7%, 0.8%, and 0.2%, respectively. The normal tissue dose-volume objectives were still met with these plans. CONCLUSION: The results of our study have shown that FDG-PET/CT can be used to define the LC volume. The increased FDG uptake was likely a result of postoperative inflammation in the LC. The targets defined using PET/CT were significantly larger than those defined with CT alone. Our results have shown that treatment plans can be generated to cover these larger PET/CT target volumes with only a modest increase in irradiated tissue volume compared with CT-determined PTVs. FAU - Ford, Eric C AU - Ford EC AD - Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA. eric.ford@jhmi.edu. FAU - Lavely, William C AU - Lavely WC FAU - Frassica, Deborah A AU - Frassica DA FAU - Myers, Lee T AU - Myers LT FAU - Asrari, Fariba AU - Asrari F FAU - Wahl, Richard L AU - Wahl RL FAU - Zellars, Richard C AU - Zellars RC LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Evaluation Study PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't DEP - 20080418 PL - United States TA - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys JT - International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics JID - 7603616 RN - 0 (Radiopharmaceuticals) RN - 0Z5B2CJX4D (Fluorodeoxyglucose F18) SB - IM MH - Breast/diagnostic imaging/surgery MH - Breast Neoplasms/*diagnostic imaging/radiotherapy/surgery MH - Female MH - Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 MH - Humans MH - Mammography/methods MH - *Mastectomy, Segmental MH - Positron-Emission Tomography/*methods MH - Radiopharmaceuticals MH - Tomography, X-Ray Computed/*methods MH - Tumor Burden EDAT- 2008/04/09 09:00 MHDA- 2008/06/25 09:00 CRDT- 2008/04/09 09:00 PHST- 2007/08/06 00:00 [received] PHST- 2008/02/05 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2008/02/05 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2008/04/09 09:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2008/06/25 09:00 [medline] PHST- 2008/04/09 09:00 [entrez] AID - S0360-3016(08)00277-0 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.004 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jun 1;71(2):595-602. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.004. Epub 2008 Apr 18.