PMID- 18498452 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE DCOM- 20121002 LR - 20080523 IS - 1468-2494 (Electronic) IS - 0142-5463 (Linking) VI - 23 IP - 2 DP - 2001 Apr TI - Vehicle effects on skin sensitizing potency of four chemicals: assessment using the local lymph node assay. PG - 75-83 LID - 10.1046/j.1467-2494.2001.00066.x [doi] AB - The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) can be used to determine the relative skin sensitizing potency of chemicals via interpolation of the quantitative dose response data generated. Using this approach we have demonstrated previously that the vehicle matrix in which a chemical allergen is encountered on the skin can have a significant influence on sensitizing potency. Estimates of relative potency are calculated from LLNA dose responses as a function of the mathematically derived EC3 value, this being the concentration estimated to induce a stimulation index (SI) of 3. To investigate further the influence of application vehicle on sensitizing potency, the LLNA has been used to examine the activity of four recognized human contact allergens: isoeugenol and cinnamic aldehyde, two fragrance chemicals; 3-dimethylaminopropylamine (a sensitizing impurity of cocamidopropyl betaine, a surfactant used in shower gel) and dibromodicyanobutane (the sensitizing component of Euxyl K 400, a preservative used in cosmetics). The four chemicals were applied in each of seven different vehicles (acetone: olive oil [4 : 1]; dimethylsulphoxide; methylethylketone; dimethyl formamide; propylene glycol; and both 50 : 50 and 90 : 10 mixtures of ethanol and water). It was found that the vehicle in which a chemical is presented to the epidermis can have a marked effect on sensitizing activity. EC3 values ranged from 0.9 to 4.9% for isoeugenol, from 0.5 to 1.7% for cinnamic aldehyde, from 1.7 to > 10% for dimethylaminopropylamine and from 0.4 to 6.4% for dibromodicyanobutane. These data confirm that the vehicle in which a chemical is encountered on the skin has an important influence on the relative skin sensitizing potency of chemicals and may have a significant impact on the acquisition of allergic contact dermatitis. The data also demonstrate the utility of the LLNA as a method for the prediction of these effects and thus for the development of more accurate risk assessments. FAU - Wright, Z M AU - Wright ZM AD - SEAC Toxicology Unit, Unilever Research, Colworth House, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire MK44 1LQ, U.K. FAU - Basketter, P A AU - Basketter PA FAU - Blaikie, L AU - Blaikie L FAU - Cooper, K J AU - Cooper KJ FAU - Warbrick, E V AU - Warbrick EV FAU - Dearman, R J AU - Dearman RJ FAU - Kimber, I AU - Kimber I LA - eng PT - Journal Article PL - England TA - Int J Cosmet Sci JT - International journal of cosmetic science JID - 8007161 EDAT- 2008/05/24 09:00 MHDA- 2008/05/24 09:01 CRDT- 2008/05/24 09:00 PHST- 2008/05/24 09:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2008/05/24 09:01 [medline] PHST- 2008/05/24 09:00 [entrez] AID - ICS066 [pii] AID - 10.1046/j.1467-2494.2001.00066.x [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Int J Cosmet Sci. 2001 Apr;23(2):75-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-2494.2001.00066.x.