PMID- 18565744 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20090204 LR - 20211028 IS - 0936-6555 (Print) IS - 1433-2981 (Electronic) IS - 0936-6555 (Linking) VI - 20 IP - 8 DP - 2008 Oct TI - Accuracy and reproducibility of conformal radiotherapy using data from a randomised controlled trial of conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer (MRC RT01, ISRCTN47772397). PG - 582-90 LID - 10.1016/j.clon.2008.04.019 [doi] AB - AIMS: The MRC RT01 trial used conformal radiotherapy to the prostate, a method that reduces the volume of normal tissue treated by 40-50%. Because of the risk of geographical miss, the trial used portal imaging to examine whether treatment delivery was within the required accuracy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 843 patients were randomly assigned to receive 64 Gy in 32 fractions over 6.5 weeks or 74 Gy in 37 fractions over 7.5 weeks. Field displacements and corrections were recorded for all imaged fractions. Displacement trends and their association with time, disease and treatment set-up characteristics were examined using univariate and multivariate analyses. A Radiographer Trial Implementation Group (RTIG) was set up to inform the quality assurance process and to promote the development of best practice. RESULTS: Treatment isocentre positioning was within 5 mm in every direction on 6238 (83%) of the 7535 fractions imaged. In total, 532 (81%) of 695 included patients had at least one > or = 3 mm displacement and 415 (63%) had at least one > or = 5 mm displacement. Univariate, multivariate and stepwise models of > or =5 mm displacements showed an increased likelihood of displacement in weeks 1 and 2 with low melting point alloy (LMPA) blocks compared with multileaf collimators, film verification compared with electronic portal imaging (EPI) and increased number of fractions imaged. Except for LMPA, this was also seen for > or = 5 mm displacements in weeks 3-6. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate conformal treatment was delivered. The use of EPI was associated with increased reported accuracy. The RTIG was a crucial part of the quality assurance process. FAU - Stanley, S AU - Stanley S AD - St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, UK. suzanne.stanley@leedsth.nhs.uk FAU - Griffiths, S AU - Griffiths S FAU - Sydes, M R AU - Sydes MR FAU - Moore, A R AU - Moore AR FAU - Syndikus, I AU - Syndikus I FAU - Dearnaley, D P AU - Dearnaley DP CN - RT01 Radiographer Trial Implementation Group LA - eng SI - ISRCTN/ISRCTN47772397 GR - G0501019/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom GR - MC_U122861330/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom PT - Journal Article PT - Randomized Controlled Trial DEP - 20080618 PL - England TA - Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) JT - Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) JID - 9002902 SB - IM MH - Adenocarcinoma/*radiotherapy MH - Humans MH - Logistic Models MH - Male MH - Prostatic Neoplasms/*radiotherapy MH - Quality Assurance, Health Care MH - Radiotherapy, Conformal/*methods MH - Reproducibility of Results PMC - PMC2568874 EDAT- 2008/06/21 09:00 MHDA- 2009/02/05 09:00 PMCR- 2008/10/01 CRDT- 2008/06/21 09:00 PHST- 2007/03/05 00:00 [received] PHST- 2008/04/08 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2008/04/10 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2008/06/21 09:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2009/02/05 09:00 [medline] PHST- 2008/06/21 09:00 [entrez] PHST- 2008/10/01 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - S0936-6555(08)00253-7 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.clon.2008.04.019 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2008 Oct;20(8):582-90. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2008.04.019. Epub 2008 Jun 18.