PMID- 19022486 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20090305 LR - 20090202 IS - 1527-9995 (Electronic) IS - 0090-4295 (Linking) VI - 73 IP - 2 DP - 2009 Feb TI - Prognostic significance of nondiagnostic molecular changes in urine detected by UroVysion fluorescence in situ hybridization during surveillance for bladder cancer. PG - 347-50 LID - 10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.042 [doi] AB - OBJECTIVES: To determine the outcomes for patients with nondiagnostic fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (ie, < 4 gains of chromosomes 3, 7, or 17 in < or = 3 cells). FISH detects urothelial carcinoma and is especially beneficial in patients with negative or atypical urine cytology findings. A positive result is defined as a gain of > or = 2 chromosomes (3, 7, or 17) in 4 cells, isolated loss of 9p21 in 12 cells, or isolated gains of only 1 chromosome in > or = 10% of cells. Most FISH-positive patients will develop recurrent urothelial carcinoma within 1 year. METHODS: We compared the data from 149 patients with a nondiagnostic FISH result and > or = 30 months of follow-up with the data from patients with a negative FISH result from the same period. The time to conversion to a positive FISH result or the development of a bladder tumor was recorded. RESULTS: Patients with nondiagnostic FISH results had significantly greater rates of progression to positive FISH findings or the development of a bladder tumor than did patients with negative FISH findings. Most progression occurred within 1 year. Patients with nondiagnostic FISH results and concurrent negative cytology and cystoscopy had a very low risk of developing recurrent disease, similar to that found with truly negative FISH results. CONCLUSIONS: Nondiagnostic FISH results are related to a greater risk of progression to positive FISH results and tumor recurrence than those with negative FISH findings. However, after controlling for negative cytologic and cystoscopic status, a nondiagnostic FISH result does not appear to be an independent predictor of disease recurrence, and aggressive investigation is not warranted. FAU - Nguyen, Carvell T AU - Nguyen CT AD - Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA. FAU - Litt, David B AU - Litt DB FAU - Dolar, Sandra E AU - Dolar SE FAU - Ulchaker, James C AU - Ulchaker JC FAU - Jones, J Stephen AU - Jones JS FAU - Brainard, Jennifer A AU - Brainard JA LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20081120 PL - United States TA - Urology JT - Urology JID - 0366151 SB - IM MH - Aged MH - Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/*urine MH - Female MH - Humans MH - *In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence MH - Male MH - Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/*urine MH - Population Surveillance MH - Prognosis MH - Risk Assessment MH - Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/*urine EDAT- 2008/11/22 09:00 MHDA- 2009/03/06 09:00 CRDT- 2008/11/22 09:00 PHST- 2008/07/09 00:00 [received] PHST- 2008/08/21 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2008/09/20 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2008/11/22 09:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2009/03/06 09:00 [medline] PHST- 2008/11/22 09:00 [entrez] AID - S0090-4295(08)01669-5 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.042 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Urology. 2009 Feb;73(2):347-50. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.042. Epub 2008 Nov 20.