PMID- 19029209 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20090303 LR - 20211020 IS - 1740-7745 (Print) IS - 1740-7753 (Electronic) IS - 1740-7745 (Linking) VI - 5 IP - 6 DP - 2008 TI - Use of biological assignment in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation clinical trials. PG - 607-16 LID - 10.1177/1740774508098326 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: When comparing treatments for a specific illness, it is sometimes impractical or impossible to conduct a randomized clinical trial (RCT). Biological assignment trials are one alternative design. In hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) trials, a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor is considered optimal, but such donors are available for only 20-30% of otherwise eligible patients. Rather than randomizing only those with a matched sibling donor, in a recent multiple myeloma trial, the type of HCT each patient received was biologically based, i.e., chosen according to whether or not the patient had a matched sibling donor. PURPOSE: This article describes the design and implementation of biological assignment trials as well as their advantages and disadvantages. METHODS: We focus on several aspects of such trials, including efficiency of trial duration, ethical issues, and potential sources of bias. Statistical issues are considered including sample size calculations, monitoring for biased enrollment, and adjustments for imbalances in patient characteristics. A multiple myeloma trial is used as an illustration. RESULTS: Although they often require a larger sample size, biological assignment trials can provide substantial efficiency in terms of study duration over randomized trials when accrual to a randomized trial would be slow. Determination of sample size requires consideration of the anticipated proportion of patients with a biologically favored (HLA-matched sibling) donor. An add-on randomization of patients without a matched sibling donor may alleviate ethical concerns about applicability of study results to all patients regardless of whether the biological assignment groups differ with respect to outcome. LIMITATIONS: Prognostic factor imbalance and enrollment bias can occur in a biological assignment trial. Statistical adjustment for potential imbalance in prognostic factors is important, as is monitoring center accrual for enrollment bias and performing an appropriate intention-to-treat analysis. CONCLUSIONS: A biological assignment trial can be a reasonable way to compare treatments which are biologically based, such as HLA-matched sibling transplants, when the gold-standard randomized trial design is impractical or impossible. Implementing such a trial requires careful consideration of the ethical issues and potential biases. FAU - Logan, Brent AU - Logan B AD - Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. blogan@mcw.edu FAU - Leifer, Eric AU - Leifer E FAU - Bredeson, Chris AU - Bredeson C FAU - Horowitz, Mary AU - Horowitz M FAU - Ewell, Marian AU - Ewell M FAU - Carter, Shelly AU - Carter S FAU - Geller, Nancy AU - Geller N LA - eng GR - U10 HL069294/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States GR - U24 CA076518/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States GR - U10 HL069330/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States GR - U01-HL-69294/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States GR - U01 HL069294/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States GR - U01 HL069294-07/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural PL - England TA - Clin Trials JT - Clinical trials (London, England) JID - 101197451 RN - 0 (HLA Antigens) SB - IM MH - Feasibility Studies MH - *HLA Antigens MH - Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods MH - *Histocompatibility Testing MH - Humans MH - Multiple Myeloma/immunology/therapy MH - *Patient Selection MH - *Random Allocation MH - *Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic MH - Selection Bias MH - Transplantation, Autologous MH - Transplantation, Homologous PMC - PMC2671015 MID - NIHMS102157 EDAT- 2008/11/26 09:00 MHDA- 2009/03/04 09:00 PMCR- 2009/04/21 CRDT- 2008/11/26 09:00 PHST- 2008/11/26 09:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2009/03/04 09:00 [medline] PHST- 2008/11/26 09:00 [entrez] PHST- 2009/04/21 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 5/6/607 [pii] AID - 10.1177/1740774508098326 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Clin Trials. 2008;5(6):607-16. doi: 10.1177/1740774508098326.