PMID- 19059115 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20090619 LR - 20081208 IS - 1557-3117 (Electronic) IS - 1053-2498 (Linking) VI - 27 IP - 12 DP - 2008 Dec TI - Human, bovine and porcine systematic vascular input impedances are not equivalent: implications for device testing and xenotransplantation in heart failure. PG - 1340-7 LID - 10.1016/j.healun.2008.08.009 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Advanced therapies for heart failure (HF), such as mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices and xenotransplantation, are usually tested in bovine and porcine models. This approach assumes a priori that animal (patho)physiology will closely match that of humans. Systemic aortic input impedance (Z(ART)) is an important physiologic determinant of left ventricular (LV) performance. We tested the hypothesis that Z(ART) is lower in bovine and porcine than in humans with normal or failing hearts. METHODS: High-fidelity aortic pressure and flow waveforms were recorded intra-operatively at native and paced heart rates of 100 beats per minute (bpm) in adult human patients with normal LV function (n = 13) or end-stage HF (n = 15), and normal calves (n = 10) and pigs (n = 18). Fast Fourier transformation was used to calculate Z(ART), and arterial resistance and compliance were estimated using a 4-element Windkessel model. RESULTS: Humans with HF had greater Z(ART) than those with normal LV function, characterized by higher resistance (1.16 +/- 0.12 vs 1.00 +/- 0.10 mm Hg x s/ml, p < 0.05) and lower compliance (1.53 +/- 0.21 vs 1.88 +/- 0.33 ml x mm Hg, p < 0.05). Healthy calves and pigs had significantly lower resistance (calf: 0.63 +/- 0.07 mm Hg x s/ml; pig: 0.90 +/- 0.07 mm Hg x s/ml) and higher compliance (calf: 2.79 +/- 0.37 ml x mm Hg; pig: 2.80 +/- 0.64 ml x mm Hg) when compared to humans (p < 0.05) with normal or failing hearts. CONCLUSIONS: Z(ART) is significantly lower in calves and pigs than in humans with or without HF. This finding has important implications for the pre-clinical testing of MCS devices and xenotransplants, which are usually examined in bovine and porcine models, respectively. Specifically, these therapies may respond differently in humans than animals due to non-equivalence of systemic after-load. FAU - Koenig, Steven C AU - Koenig SC AD - Cardiovascular Innovation Institute, Department of Bioengineering and Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 502-852-1795, USA. sckoen@gwise.loiusville.edu FAU - Giridharan, Guruprasad A AU - Giridharan GA FAU - Ewart, Daniel L AU - Ewart DL FAU - Schroeder, Mark J AU - Schroeder MJ FAU - Ionan, Constantine AU - Ionan C FAU - Slaughter, Mark S AU - Slaughter MS FAU - Sobieski, Michael AU - Sobieski M FAU - Pantalos, George M AU - Pantalos GM FAU - Dowling, Robert D AU - Dowling RD FAU - Prabhu, Sumanth D AU - Prabhu SD LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't PL - United States TA - J Heart Lung Transplant JT - The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation JID - 9102703 SB - IM MH - Aged MH - Animals MH - Aorta, Thoracic/*physiology/physiopathology MH - Cardiography, Impedance MH - Cattle MH - *Coronary Artery Bypass MH - Female MH - Heart Failure/physiopathology/*surgery MH - Heart Rate MH - Heart Transplantation/*physiology MH - *Heart-Assist Devices MH - Hemodynamics MH - Humans MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Species Specificity MH - Supine Position MH - Swine MH - *Transplantation, Heterologous MH - Ventricular Function, Left/physiology EDAT- 2008/12/09 09:00 MHDA- 2009/06/20 09:00 CRDT- 2008/12/09 09:00 PHST- 2007/12/18 00:00 [received] PHST- 2008/05/16 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2008/08/21 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2008/12/09 09:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2009/06/20 09:00 [medline] PHST- 2008/12/09 09:00 [entrez] AID - S1053-2498(08)00620-7 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.healun.2008.08.009 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Dec;27(12):1340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2008.08.009.