PMID- 19223830 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20090618 LR - 20211020 IS - 1526-9914 (Electronic) IS - 1526-9914 (Linking) VI - 10 IP - 1 DP - 2009 Feb 5 TI - Independent calculation of dose from a helical TomoTherapy unit. PG - 103-119 LID - 10.1120/jacmp.v10i1.2772 [doi] AB - A new calculation algorithm has been developed for independently verifying doses calculated by the TomoTherapy Hi.Art treatment planning system (TPS). The algorithm is designed to confirm the dose to a point in a high dose, low dose-gradient region. Patient data used by the algorithm include the radiological depth to the point for each projection angle and the treatment sinogram file controlling the leaf opening time for each projection. The algorithm uses common dosimetric functions [tissue phantom ratio (TPR) and output factor (Scp)] for the central axis combined with lateral and longitudinal beam profile data to quantify the off-axis dose dependence. Machine data for the dosimetric functions were measured on the Hi.Art machine and simulated using the TPS. Point dose calculations were made for several test phantoms and for 97 patient treatment plans using the simulated machine data. Comparisons with TPS-predicted point doses for the phantom treatment plans demonstrated agreement within 2% for both on-axis and off-axis planning target volumes (PTVs). Comparisons with TPS-predicted point doses for the patient treatment plans also showed good agreement. For calculations at sites other than lung and superficial PTVs, agreement between the calculations was within 2% for 94% of the patient calculations (64 of 68). Calculations within lung and superficial PTVs overestimated the dose by an average of 3.1% (sigma=2.4%) and 3.2% (sigma=2.2%), respectively. Systematic errors within lung are probably due to the weakness of the algorithm in correcting for missing tissue and/or tissue density heterogeneities. Errors encountered within superficial PTVs probably result from the algorithm overestimating the scatter dose within the patient. Our results demonstrate that for the majority of cases, the algorithm could be used without further refinement to independently verify patient treatment plans. FAU - Gibbons, John P AU - Gibbons JP AD - Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, U.S.A. AD - Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, U.S.A. FAU - Smith, Koren AU - Smith K AD - Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, U.S.A. FAU - Cheek, Dennis AU - Cheek D AD - Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, U.S.A. FAU - Rosen, Isaac AU - Rosen I AD - Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, U.S.A. AD - Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, U.S.A. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't DEP - 20090205 PL - United States TA - J Appl Clin Med Phys JT - Journal of applied clinical medical physics JID - 101089176 SB - IM MH - *Algorithms MH - Computer Simulation MH - Humans MH - Phantoms, Imaging MH - Radiotherapy Dosage MH - Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/*methods MH - Reproducibility of Results PMC - PMC5720509 EDAT- 2009/02/19 09:00 MHDA- 2009/06/19 09:00 PMCR- 2009/02/05 CRDT- 2009/02/19 09:00 PHST- 2007/10/11 00:00 [received] PHST- 2008/10/06 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2009/02/19 09:00 [entrez] PHST- 2009/02/19 09:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2009/06/19 09:00 [medline] PHST- 2009/02/05 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - ACM20103 [pii] AID - 10.1120/jacmp.v10i1.2772 [doi] PST - epublish SO - J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2009 Feb 5;10(1):103-119. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v10i1.2772.