PMID- 19281503 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20090928 LR - 20090615 IS - 1600-0501 (Electronic) IS - 0905-7161 (Linking) VI - 20 IP - 5 DP - 2009 May TI - Soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self-contained dehiscences. A 12-month controlled clinical trial. PG - 482-8 LID - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01688.x [doi] AB - AIM: To assess soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self-contained dehiscences. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For this 12-month controlled clinical trial, 15 subjects received immediate transmucosal tapered-effect (TE) implants placed in molar extraction sockets displaying a buccal bone dehiscence (test sites) with a height and a width of > or =3 mm, respectively. Peri-implant marginal defects were treated according to the principles of Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) by means of deproteinized bovine bone mineral particles in conjunction with a bioresorbable collagen membrane. Fifteen subjects received implants in healed molar sites (control sites) with intact buccal alveolar walls following tooth extraction. In total, 30 TE implants with an endosseous diameter of 4.8 mm and a shoulder diameter of 6.5 mm were used. Flaps were repositioned and sutured, allowing non-submerged, transmucosal soft tissues healing. At the 12-month follow-up, pocket probing depths (PPD) and clinical attachment levels (CAL) were compared between implants placed in the test and the control sites, respectively. RESULTS: All subjects completed the 12-month follow-up period. All implants healed uneventfully, yielding a survival rate of 100%. After 12 months, statistically significantly higher (P<0.05) PPD and CAL values were recorded around implants placed in the test sites compared with those placed in the control sites. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this controlled clinical trial showed that healing following immediate transmucosal implant installation in molar extraction sites with wide and shallow buccal dehiscences yielded less favorable outcomes compared with those of implants placed in healed sites, and resulted in lack of 'complete' osseointegration. FAU - Siciliano, V Iorio AU - Siciliano VI AD - Department of Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. FAU - Salvi, G E AU - Salvi GE FAU - Matarasso, S AU - Matarasso S FAU - Cafiero, C AU - Cafiero C FAU - Blasi, A AU - Blasi A FAU - Lang, N P AU - Lang NP LA - eng PT - Controlled Clinical Trial PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't DEP - 20090304 PL - Denmark TA - Clin Oral Implants Res JT - Clinical oral implants research JID - 9105713 RN - 0 (Bio-Oss) RN - 0 (Minerals) MH - Adult MH - Animals MH - Bone Matrix/transplantation MH - Cattle MH - Chi-Square Distribution MH - Crowns MH - Dental Implantation, Endosseous/*methods MH - *Dental Implants, Single-Tooth MH - Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported MH - Dental Restoration Failure MH - Female MH - Follow-Up Studies MH - Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal/methods MH - Humans MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Minerals/therapeutic use MH - Molar MH - Mouth Mucosa/physiology MH - Osseointegration/drug effects/*physiology MH - Periodontal Index MH - Prospective Studies MH - Surgical Wound Dehiscence/*complications/therapy MH - Tooth Extraction MH - Tooth Socket/drug effects/*surgery MH - Wound Healing/drug effects/*physiology EDAT- 2009/03/14 09:00 MHDA- 2009/09/29 06:00 CRDT- 2009/03/14 09:00 PHST- 2009/03/14 09:00 [entrez] PHST- 2009/03/14 09:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2009/09/29 06:00 [medline] AID - CLR1688 [pii] AID - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01688.x [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 May;20(5):482-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01688.x. Epub 2009 Mar 4.