PMID- 19372057 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20110505 LR - 20110103 IS - 1873-2496 (Electronic) IS - 1078-1439 (Linking) VI - 29 IP - 1 DP - 2011 Jan-Feb TI - Sex-specific hormone receptors in urothelial carcinomas of the human urinary bladder: a comparative analysis of clinicopathological features and survival outcomes according to receptor expression. PG - 43-51 LID - 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.01.033 [doi] AB - OBJECTIVES: To investigate the expression of sex-specific hormone receptors in normal bladder urothelium and urothelial carcinomas (UCs) of the bladder, and to analyze clinicopathological features and survival outcomes according to receptor expression. METHODS: We evaluated the clinical data and tumor specimens of 139 patients with bladder cancer (BC). In addition, 72 samples of normal urothelium were included. Immunohistochemistry was performed using streptavidin-biotin peroxidase method, a monoclonal androgen receptor (AR), and an estrogen receptor-beta (ERbeta) antibody on paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Expression levels of each receptor were assessed by evaluating 500 tumor cells for each case and the percentage of positively-stained nuclei was recorded. RESULTS: None of the 58 male control cases showed any AR and ERbeta expression. Five (35, 71%) of the 14 female control cases expressed ERbeta. Of the 139 patients with UCs, 71 (51, 07%) expressed AR (62 male vs. 9 female; P = 0.413) and 44 (31, 65%) (39 male vs. 5 female; P = 0.402) showed ERbeta expression (P < 0.001). No significant relationship was found between ERbeta expression levels and tumor grades, and stages (P = 0.441; P = 0.247). AR expression was significantly lower in T2-tumors (21%) than in Ta-tumors (60%) and T1-tumors (60%) (P < 0.001). It was significantly higher in low-grade papillary UCs (64%) compared with high-grade papillary UCs (44%) and infiltrative high-grade UCs (17%) (P = 0.039; P < 0.001). Data of 79 patients with noninvasive BC were eligible to present, with a median 29 months follow-up. AR expression level did not influence recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.095; P = 0.110). No significant association was found between ERbeta expression level and RFS (P = 0.293). PFS in patients with lower ERbeta-expressing tumors was significantly better than that in patients with higher ERbeta-expressing tumors (P = 0.035). Multivariate analysis confirmed this significant influence on PFS (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Although ERbeta expression had no impact on histopathological tumor characteristics, decrease in its expression may be associated with better PFS rates in patients with noninvasive BC. Conversely, loss of AR expression was associated with higher grade UCs and invasive UCs, but had no prognostic effect on survival. Finally, sex-specific hormone receptors alone cannot be responsible for gender differences in BC rates because they were expressed in similar rates in both sexes. CI - Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. FAU - Tuygun, Can AU - Tuygun C AD - Department of Urology, Ministry of Health Yildirim Beyazit Diskapi Educational and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. tuyguncan@yahoo.com FAU - Kankaya, Duygu AU - Kankaya D FAU - Imamoglu, Abdurrahim AU - Imamoglu A FAU - Sertcelik, Ayse AU - Sertcelik A FAU - Zengin, Kursad AU - Zengin K FAU - Oktay, Murat AU - Oktay M FAU - Sertcelik, Nurettin AU - Sertcelik N LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article DEP - 20090416 PL - United States TA - Urol Oncol JT - Urologic oncology JID - 9805460 RN - 0 (AR protein, human) RN - 0 (Estrogen Receptor beta) RN - 0 (Receptors, Androgen) SB - IM MH - Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/*metabolism/pathology MH - Case-Control Studies MH - Estrogen Receptor beta/*metabolism MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Immunoenzyme Techniques MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Prognosis MH - Receptors, Androgen/*metabolism MH - Survival Rate MH - Urinary Bladder/*metabolism MH - Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/*metabolism/pathology EDAT- 2009/04/18 09:00 MHDA- 2011/05/06 06:00 CRDT- 2009/04/18 09:00 PHST- 2008/11/25 00:00 [received] PHST- 2009/01/25 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2009/01/27 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2009/04/18 09:00 [entrez] PHST- 2009/04/18 09:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2011/05/06 06:00 [medline] AID - S1078-1439(09)00035-0 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.01.033 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Urol Oncol. 2011 Jan-Feb;29(1):43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.01.033. Epub 2009 Apr 16.