PMID- 19553772 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20090928 LR - 20220408 IS - 1710-2774 (Print) IS - 1710-2774 (Linking) VI - 12 IP - 3 DP - 2009 TI - Tracking emergency department overcrowding in a tertiary care academic institution. PG - 99-106 AB - Despite the release of a national report describing key markers of emergency department (ED) overcrowding, limited linear data using these markers have been published. We sought to report the degree and trends of ED overcrowding in a typical academic hospital and to highlight some of the key markers of ED patient flow and care. We conducted a prospective study in a large Canadian urban tertiary care teaching hospital that receives approximately 55,000 annual adult ED visits. A database captured demographic and real-time process of care data for each patient from 2000 to 2007. Descriptive data are reported using Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) scores. Over the study period, the ED patient visit volume and presentation times remained predictable. Emergent cases (CTAS levels 1-2) doubled from 8 to 16.6%, and urgent cases (CTAS level 3) increased from 40.2 to 50.3%. Moreover, semi-urgent presentations (CTAS level 4) decreased from 42.4 to 28.8%, and non-urgent cases (CTAS level 5) dropped from 9.4 to 4.3%. The median wait time from triage to bed location increased from two minutes (inter-quartile range [IQR] 1, 46) in 2000 to 27 minutes (IQR 2, 110) in 2007, while the median time from bed location to physician remained constant (29 minutes in 2001 versus 28 minutes in 2007). Overall, admissions increased from 20.4 to 23%. Semi-urgent and non-urgent admissions dropped from 11.5 to 7.4% and 3.2 to 1.8%, respectively. Admitted patients "boarding" in the ED increased from 70,955 hours in 2002 to 118,741 hours in 2007, while the number of emergent and urgent patients leaving without being seen increased by more than 400%. ED overcrowding in a tertiary care hospital is primarily a result of access block due to boarding admitted patients, a situation that poses serious risks to the majority of patients who have emergent or urgent conditions that cannot be managed appropriately in the waiting room. FAU - Bullard, Michael J AU - Bullard MJ AD - Department of Emergency Medicine at University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. michael.bullard@ualberta.ca FAU - Villa-Roel, Cristina AU - Villa-Roel C FAU - Bond, Kenneth AU - Bond K FAU - Vester, Michael AU - Vester M FAU - Holroyd, Brian R AU - Holroyd BR FAU - Rowe, Brian H AU - Rowe BH LA - eng PT - Journal Article PL - Canada TA - Healthc Q JT - Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.) JID - 101208192 CIN - Healthc Q. 2009;12(3):107-9. PMID: 19553773 MH - *Academic Medical Centers MH - *Crowding MH - *Efficiency, Organizational MH - Emergency Service, Hospital/*organization & administration MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Male MH - Organizational Case Studies MH - Prospective Studies EDAT- 2009/06/26 09:00 MHDA- 2009/09/29 06:00 CRDT- 2009/06/26 09:00 PHST- 2009/06/26 09:00 [entrez] PHST- 2009/06/26 09:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2009/09/29 06:00 [medline] AID - 10.12927/hcq.2013.20884 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Healthc Q. 2009;12(3):99-106. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2013.20884.