PMID- 19706292 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20091224 LR - 20220321 IS - 1528-0012 (Electronic) IS - 0016-5085 (Print) IS - 0016-5085 (Linking) VI - 137 IP - 6 DP - 2009 Dec TI - Psychometric evaluation of patient-reported outcomes in irritable bowel syndrome randomized controlled trials: a Rome Foundation report. PG - 1944-53.e1-3 LID - 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.08.047 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is debate about how best to measure patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We pooled data to measure the psychometric properties of IBS end points, including binary responses (eg, "adequate relief") and 50% improvement in symptom severity. METHODS: We pooled data from 12 IBS drug trials involving 10,066 participants. We tested the properties of binary response and 50% improvement end points, including the impact of baseline severity on performance, and measured construct validity using clinical anchors. RESULTS: There were 9044 evaluable subjects (age, 44 years; 85% female; 58% IBS constipation-prominent [IBS-C]; 31% IBS diarrhea-prominent [IBS-D]). Using the binary end point, the proportion responding in the mild, moderate, and severe groups was 42%, 40%, and 38%, respectively (P = .0008). There was no effect of baseline severity on binary response (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.0; P = .07). The proportions reaching 50% improvement in pain were 45%, 41%, and 41%, respectively; there was a small, yet significant, impact of baseline severity (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.05; P < .0001) that did not meet clinical relevance criteria. Both end points revealed strong construct validity and detected "minimally clinically important differences" in symptoms. Both provided better discriminant spread in IBS-D than IBS-C. CONCLUSIONS: Both the traditional binary and 50% improvement end points are equivalent in their psychometric properties. Neither is impacted by baseline severity, and both demonstrate excellent construct validity. They are optimized for the IBS-D population but also appear valid in IBS-C. FAU - Spiegel, Brennan AU - Spiegel B AD - Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA. bspiegel@mednet.ulca.edu FAU - Camilleri, Michael AU - Camilleri M FAU - Bolus, Roger AU - Bolus R FAU - Andresen, Viola AU - Andresen V FAU - Chey, William D AU - Chey WD FAU - Fehnel, Sheri AU - Fehnel S FAU - Mangel, Allen AU - Mangel A FAU - Talley, Nicholas J AU - Talley NJ FAU - Whitehead, William E AU - Whitehead WE LA - eng GR - 1 R24 AT002681/AT/NCCIH NIH HHS/United States GR - R24 AT002681/AT/NCCIH NIH HHS/United States GR - R24 AT002681-05/AT/NCCIH NIH HHS/United States GR - P30 DK041301/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States GR - 2P30 DK 041301-17/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States PT - Journal Article PT - Meta-Analysis PT - Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't PT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. DEP - 20090823 PL - United States TA - Gastroenterology JT - Gastroenterology JID - 0374630 SB - IM MH - Abdominal Pain/etiology/*prevention & control/psychology MH - Adult MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Irritable Bowel Syndrome/complications/diagnosis/psychology/*therapy MH - Logistic Models MH - Male MH - Odds Ratio MH - *Pain Measurement MH - *Patient Satisfaction MH - Predictive Value of Tests MH - *Psychometrics MH - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic MH - Reproducibility of Results MH - Severity of Illness Index MH - Treatment Outcome PMC - PMC2793276 MID - NIHMS141061 EDAT- 2009/08/27 09:00 MHDA- 2009/12/25 06:00 PMCR- 2010/12/01 CRDT- 2009/08/27 09:00 PHST- 2009/04/29 00:00 [received] PHST- 2009/07/28 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2009/08/12 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2009/08/27 09:00 [entrez] PHST- 2009/08/27 09:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2009/12/25 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2010/12/01 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - S0016-5085(09)01481-4 [pii] AID - 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.08.047 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Gastroenterology. 2009 Dec;137(6):1944-53.e1-3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.08.047. Epub 2009 Aug 23.