PMID- 19922593 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20100219 LR - 20141120 IS - 1365-2559 (Electronic) IS - 0309-0167 (Linking) VI - 55 IP - 6 DP - 2009 Dec TI - Chromogenic in situ hybridization for Her-2/neu-oncogene in breast cancer: comparison of a new dual-colour chromogenic in situ hybridization with immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. PG - 716-23 LID - 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03427.x [doi] AB - AIMS: Her-2/neu testing is used as a marker for Herceptin therapy. The aim was to investigate new dual-colour chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), in a large number of breast carcinomas (n = 205) with DNA-specific dual-colour probes (ZytoVision, Bremerhaven, Germany) and to compare the results with immunohistochemistry (n = 205) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (n = 129). METHODS AND RESULTS: Paraffin-embedded tissue of 205 patients was used. After immunohistochemistry with a focus on immunohistochemically uncertain cases, Her-2/neu amplification using dual-colour CISH (ZytoVision) was analysed. Validation by FISH was performed. The results were: immunohistochemistry, 27.8% with strong expression, 53.7% with uncertain overexpression and 18.5% with no expression; FISH, 25.6% amplified and 74.4% negative; CISH, 35.6% amplified, 62.9% negative and 1.5% not evaluable. Comparison of immunohistochemistry with CISH: CISH negative in 100% with immunohistochemistry 0/1+, amplified in 82.5% with immunohistochemistry 3+; 5.9% contradictory results: 4.4% immunohistochemistry 3+ and negative by CISH, 1.5% negative in immunohistochemistry but amplified by CISH; FISH (129 cases), 8.5% contradictory results to immunohistochemistry, 6.2% immunohistochemistry 3+ and negative by FISH, 2.3% negative by immunohistochemistry and amplified by FISH; comparison of CISH and FISH, 94.6% same results, 3.9% different ones, 1.6% CISH not analysable. CONCLUSIONS: CISH, using dual-colour probes (ZytoVision) is as good as FISH for Her-2/neu analysis. The few discrepant results are likely to be caused by polysomy or tumour heterogeneity. FAU - Mayr, Doris AU - Mayr D AD - Pathologisches Institut, Ludwig Maximilians Universitaet, Munchen, Germany. doris.mayr@med.uni-muenchen.de FAU - Heim, Sibylle AU - Heim S FAU - Weyrauch, Kerstin AU - Weyrauch K FAU - Zeindl-Eberhart, Evelyn AU - Zeindl-Eberhart E FAU - Kunz, Anne AU - Kunz A FAU - Engel, Jutta AU - Engel J FAU - Kirchner, Thomas AU - Kirchner T LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article PL - England TA - Histopathology JT - Histopathology JID - 7704136 RN - 0 (Chromogenic Compounds) RN - 0 (RNA, Messenger) RN - EC 2.7.10.1 (ERBB2 protein, human) RN - EC 2.7.10.1 (Receptor, ErbB-2) SB - IM MH - Breast Neoplasms/genetics/*metabolism MH - Carcinoma/genetics/*metabolism MH - Chi-Square Distribution MH - Chromogenic Compounds MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Immunohistochemistry/*methods MH - In Situ Hybridization/*methods MH - Neoplasm Staging MH - RNA, Messenger/genetics/metabolism MH - Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics/*metabolism EDAT- 2009/11/20 06:00 MHDA- 2010/02/20 06:00 CRDT- 2009/11/20 06:00 PHST- 2009/11/20 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2009/11/20 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2010/02/20 06:00 [medline] AID - HIS3427 [pii] AID - 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03427.x [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Histopathology. 2009 Dec;55(6):716-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03427.x.