PMID- 20187877 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20100720 LR - 20220409 IS - 1469-8749 (Electronic) IS - 0012-1622 (Linking) VI - 52 IP - 7 DP - 2010 Jul TI - The effect of psychosocial stimulation on cognition and behaviour at 6 years in a cohort of term, low-birthweight Jamaican children. PG - e148-54 LID - 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03637.x [doi] AB - AIM: The aim of this study was to determine whether psychosocial stimulation up to the age of 2 years benefits cognition and behaviour at age 6 years in low-birthweight, term-born (LBW-T) children (gestational age > or =37 wk, birthweight <2500g), and to compare LBW-T and normal-birthweight (NBW) children. METHOD: LBW-T Jamaican infants were randomized at birth to a control group or an intervention group. Children in the intervention group received psychosocial stimulation for 2 years. LBW-T infants were also compared with NBW infants born in the same hospital. IQ, cognitive function, and behaviour were measured at age 6 years in 109 LBW-T infants. The LBW-T group were divided into the intervention group (55 out of 70 enrolled, 32 females, 23 males; mean birthweight 2190g, SD 200g; and the control group (54 out of 70 enrolled, 33 females, 21 males; birthweight 2240g, SD 180g]. These were compared with 73 out of 94 enrolled NBW infants (38 females 35 males; birthweight 3130g, SD 330g). RESULTS: Among the LBW-T children performance IQ scores were higher in the intervention group than in the control group (regression coefficient [B] 4.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01-7.98) as were visual-spatial memory scores (B 1.12, 95% CI 0.45-1.87). Children in the intervention group also exhibited fewer behavioural difficulties (B -2.21, 95% CI -4.13 to -0.10) than children in the control group. Compared with NBW children, LBW-T children in the control group had poorer selective attention (B=-3.35, 95% CI -5.59 to -1.26) and visual-spatial memory (B=-0.76, 95% CI -1.54 to 0.00), but there were no differences in IQ, language, or behaviour. INTERPRETATION: Stimulation had sustained benefits in LBW-T infants. Finding few differences between LBW-T and NBW school-aged children concurs with results from other developing countries. FAU - Walker, Susan P AU - Walker SP AD - Epidemiology Research Unit, Tropical Medicine Research Institute, The University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica. susan.walker@uwimona.edu.jm FAU - Chang, Susan M AU - Chang SM FAU - Younger, Novie AU - Younger N FAU - Grantham-McGregor, Sally M AU - Grantham-McGregor SM LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Randomized Controlled Trial PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't DEP - 20100224 PL - England TA - Dev Med Child Neurol JT - Developmental medicine and child neurology JID - 0006761 SB - IM CIN - Evid Based Ment Health. 2010 Nov;13(4):128. PMID: 21036990 MH - Behavior MH - Child MH - Cognition MH - Cognition Disorders/*prevention & control MH - Cohort Studies MH - Female MH - Humans MH - *Infant, Low Birth Weight MH - Infant, Newborn MH - Intelligence MH - Intelligence Tests MH - Jamaica MH - Male MH - Mental Disorders/*prevention & control MH - *Mother-Child Relations MH - *Play and Playthings MH - Psychological Tests MH - *Reinforcement, Social MH - Treatment Outcome EDAT- 2010/03/02 06:00 MHDA- 2010/07/21 06:00 CRDT- 2010/03/02 06:00 PHST- 2010/03/02 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2010/03/02 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2010/07/21 06:00 [medline] AID - DMCN3637 [pii] AID - 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03637.x [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010 Jul;52(7):e148-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03637.x. Epub 2010 Feb 24.