PMID- 20381121 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20100729 LR - 20181201 IS - 1532-8392 (Electronic) IS - 0046-8177 (Linking) VI - 41 IP - 8 DP - 2010 Aug TI - EGFR fluorescence in situ hybridization-positive lung adenocarcinoma: incidence of coexisting KRAS and BRAF mutations. PG - 1053-60 LID - 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.01.008 [doi] AB - Despite growing evidence that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutation analysis is the most reliable predictor of the lung carcinoma response to EGFR-targeted therapies, there is still discussion about the role of EGFR fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Studies focusing on EGFR FISH as a predictor of response to EGFR-targeted therapies mostly focused on the relationship between EGFR FISH and EGFR mutations. The incidence of KRAS and V-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) mutations in EGFR-amplified or EGFR FISH-positive lung adenocarcinomas remains unknown. The aim of this study was to prospectively characterize the incidence of KRAS and BRAF mutations in EGFR FISH-positive surgically treated lung adenocarcinomas. Of 386 primary lung adenocarcinomas, 77 (20%) were EGFR FISH positive by University of Colorado criteria. The incidence of KRAS mutations in EGFR FISH-positive lung adenocarcinomas was 23% and was not significantly different from the incidence of KRAS mutations in EGFR FISH-negative subsets of adenocarcinoma (32%). A higher mean ratio between EGFR and chromosome 7 enumeration probe (EGFR/CEP7) was observed in EGFR-mutated tumors when compared to cases with KRAS mutation (13 versus 4.5, respectively). Our results showed significant number of EGFR FISH positive/amplified lung adenocarcinomas harboring KRAS mutation. It appears that an increase in EGFR/CEP7 ratio to cutoff point of 4.5 may distinguish between coexisting EGFR (FISH ratio of >5) or KRAS (FISH ratio of 2 to 5) mutations. Observations presented here indicate that the patient selection for EGFR-targeted therapies should include EGFR and KRAS mutational analysis, probably complemented by EGFR FISH studies. CI - 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. FAU - Chiosea, Simion AU - Chiosea S AD - Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. chioseasi@upmc.edu FAU - Shuai, Yongli AU - Shuai Y FAU - Cieply, Kathleen AU - Cieply K FAU - Nikiforova, Marina N AU - Nikiforova MN FAU - Dacic, Sanja AU - Dacic S LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20100408 PL - United States TA - Hum Pathol JT - Human pathology JID - 9421547 RN - 0 (Biomarkers, Tumor) RN - 0 (KRAS protein, human) RN - 0 (Proto-Oncogene Proteins) RN - EC 2.7.10.1 (ErbB Receptors) RN - EC 2.7.11.1 (BRAF protein, human) RN - EC 2.7.11.1 (Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf) RN - EC 3.6.5.2 (Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)) RN - EC 3.6.5.2 (ras Proteins) SB - IM MH - Adenocarcinoma/*genetics MH - Adult MH - Aged MH - Aged, 80 and over MH - Biomarkers, Tumor/*genetics MH - Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/*genetics MH - Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7/genetics/ultrastructure MH - ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors/*genetics MH - Female MH - Humans MH - In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Mutation MH - Polyribosomes/genetics MH - Prospective Studies MH - Proto-Oncogene Proteins/*genetics MH - Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/*genetics MH - Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) MH - ras Proteins/*genetics EDAT- 2010/04/13 06:00 MHDA- 2010/07/30 06:00 CRDT- 2010/04/13 06:00 PHST- 2009/10/28 00:00 [received] PHST- 2010/01/04 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2010/01/08 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2010/04/13 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2010/04/13 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2010/07/30 06:00 [medline] AID - S0046-8177(10)00024-9 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.01.008 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Hum Pathol. 2010 Aug;41(8):1053-60. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.01.008. Epub 2010 Apr 8.