PMID- 20442667 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20101012 LR - 20100630 IS - 1558-2035 (Electronic) IS - 1558-2027 (Linking) VI - 11 IP - 8 DP - 2010 Aug TI - Ultrafiltration for the treatment of diuretic-resistant, recurrent, acute decompensated heart failure: experience in a single center. PG - 599-604 LID - 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283383275 [doi] AB - PURPOSE OF STUDY: We report our experience with ultrafiltration to remove fluid overload in patients with diuretic-resistant, decompensated, congestive heart failure. METHODS: From 2005 to 2008, 42 patients with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% were treated with ultrafiltration. Patients were hospitalized for acute decompensation. Mean age was 69 years (67% men). Cause of heart failure was ischemic in 52% of cases. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class was III (64%) or IV (36%). All patients were on optimal heart failure drugs. Average dose of furosemide before ultrafiltration was 250 mg. Exclusion criteria were contraindications to anticoagulants, hematocrit more than 50%, glomerular filtration rate less than 30 ml/min and cardiogenic shock. Ultrafiltration was performed using a venous femoral bilumen catheter and anticoagulation with heparin. RESULTS: Each patient underwent one to four ultrafiltration treatments (total 70). Mean duration of a treatment was 6 h. Eighty-six percent of treatments removed more than 4000 ml of fluids; 10% removed 2000-4000 ml; 4% removed less than 2000 ml (1600-6900 ml). One ultrafiltration was aborted because of persistent hypotension. Other complications include two cases of bleeding from vascular access and six cases of worsened renal function. One patients required dialysis. Six-month mortality after ultrafiltration was 26%. Hospitalization rate, 6 months after, was 30% (compared to 66% 6 months before). Average furosemide dose, 6 months after, was 125 mg. CONCLUSION: Ultrafiltration removed fluid overload in diuretic-resistant, severe, congestive heart failure in our single-center experience. Six months after ultrafiltration, hospitalization rates were reduced by 36% and furosemide dose was 50% lower, compared to the previous 6 months. Worsened renal function was the most common complication (14% of patients). FAU - De Maria, Elia AU - De Maria E AD - Cardiology Unit, Ramazzini Hospital, Carpi, Modena, Italy. e.demaria@inwind.it FAU - Pignatti, Foliero AU - Pignatti F FAU - Patrizi, Giampiero AU - Patrizi G FAU - Benenati, P Mario AU - Benenati PM FAU - Ricci, Silvio AU - Ricci S FAU - Cappelli, Stefano AU - Cappelli S LA - eng PT - Journal Article PL - United States TA - J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) JT - Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.) JID - 101259752 RN - 0 (Diuretics) SB - IM MH - Acute Disease MH - Aged MH - Aged, 80 and over MH - Catheterization, Peripheral MH - Diuretics/*therapeutic use MH - *Drug Resistance MH - Female MH - Femoral Vein MH - Heart Failure/drug therapy/mortality/physiopathology/*therapy MH - *Hemofiltration/adverse effects/mortality MH - Hospitalization MH - Humans MH - Italy MH - Kidney Diseases/etiology/physiopathology MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Patient Readmission MH - Recurrence MH - Retrospective Studies MH - Severity of Illness Index MH - Stroke Volume MH - Time Factors MH - Treatment Failure MH - Ventricular Function, Left MH - *Water-Electrolyte Balance/drug effects EDAT- 2010/05/06 06:00 MHDA- 2010/10/13 06:00 CRDT- 2010/05/06 06:00 PHST- 2010/05/06 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2010/05/06 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2010/10/13 06:00 [medline] AID - 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283383275 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010 Aug;11(8):599-604. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283383275.