PMID- 20465836 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20100824 LR - 20240117 IS - 1532-429X (Electronic) IS - 1097-6647 (Print) IS - 1097-6647 (Linking) VI - 12 IP - 1 DP - 2010 May 13 TI - Evaluation of contrast wash-in and peak enhancement in adenosine first pass perfusion CMR in patients post bypass surgery. PG - 28 LID - 10.1186/1532-429X-12-28 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Adenosine first pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) yields excellent results for the detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD). In patients with coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) the kinetics of a contrast bolus may by altered only due to different distances through the bypass grafts compared to native vessels, thereby possibly imitating a perfusion defect. The aim of the study was to evaluate semiquantitative perfusion parameters in order to assess possible differences in epicardial contrast kinetics in areas supplied by native coronaries and CABG, both without significant stenosis. METHODS: Twenty patients with invasive exclusion of significant CAD (control group) and 38 patients with CABG without angiographically significant (>or=50%) stenosis in unbypassed coronaries or grafts were retrospectively included in the study. They underwent adenosine first pass (0.05 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA) perfusion (3 short axis views/heart beat) and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging 1 day before invasive coronary angiography. Areas perfused by native coronaries and/or the different bypasses were identified in X-ray angiography using the 16 segment model. In each of these areas upslope and maximal signal intensity (SImax) relative to the left ventricular parameters, time to 50% maximal signal intensity (TSI50%max) and time to maximal signal intensity (TSImax) were calculated. RESULTS: In areas perfused by coronary arteries with bypasses compared to native coronaries relative upslope and relative SImax did not show a significant difference. TSI50%max and TSImax in native coronaries and bypasses were 7.2s +/- 1.9s vs. 7.5s +/- 1.9s (p < 0.05) and 12.6s +/- 3.0s vs. 13.1s +/- 3.0s (p < 0.05), respectively. The delay in Tmax resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) delay of 0.5 +/- 1.1 heart beats (=images) when adjusted to the heart rate. Differences in time were most pronounced in areas perfused by left internal mammary artery grafts rather than by venous CABG, but were also present between native vessel territories in patients without CAD, albeit with smaller variability. CONCLUSION: Adenosine perfusion CMR in patients post CABG may be associated with a short delay in contrast arrival. However, once the contrast is in the myocardium there is similar wash-in kinetics and peak enhancement. Therefore, since the delay is only short, the possibly differing contrast kinetics through grafts and native vessels does not seem to be a limiting factor for the accuracy of first pass adenosine perfusion in patients post CABG. FAU - Kelle, Sebastian AU - Kelle S AD - German Heart Institute Berlin, Germany. FAU - Graf, Kristof AU - Graf K FAU - Dreysse, Stefan AU - Dreysse S FAU - Schnackenburg, Bernhard AU - Schnackenburg B FAU - Fleck, Eckart AU - Fleck E FAU - Klein, Christoph AU - Klein C LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20100513 PL - England TA - J Cardiovasc Magn Reson JT - Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance JID - 9815616 RN - 0 (Contrast Media) RN - K2I13DR72L (Gadolinium DTPA) RN - K72T3FS567 (Adenosine) SB - IM MH - *Adenosine MH - Adult MH - Aged MH - Constriction, Pathologic MH - *Contrast Media MH - Coronary Angiography MH - *Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects MH - *Coronary Circulation MH - Female MH - *Gadolinium DTPA MH - Graft Occlusion, Vascular/*diagnosis/etiology/physiopathology MH - Heart Rate MH - Humans MH - *Magnetic Resonance Imaging MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Myocardial Perfusion Imaging/*methods MH - Predictive Value of Tests MH - Retrospective Studies MH - Time Factors MH - Treatment Outcome MH - *Vascular Patency PMC - PMC2887852 EDAT- 2010/05/15 06:00 MHDA- 2010/08/25 06:00 PMCR- 2010/05/13 CRDT- 2010/05/15 06:00 PHST- 2009/12/18 00:00 [received] PHST- 2010/05/13 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2010/05/15 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2010/05/15 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2010/08/25 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2010/05/13 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - S1097-6647(23)01308-X [pii] AID - 1532-429X-12-28 [pii] AID - 10.1186/1532-429X-12-28 [doi] PST - epublish SO - J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010 May 13;12(1):28. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-12-28.