PMID- 20823838 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20110119 LR - 20220318 IS - 1572-0241 (Electronic) IS - 0002-9270 (Linking) VI - 105 IP - 12 DP - 2010 Dec TI - Prevalence and symptom pattern of pathologic esophageal acid reflux in patients with functional dyspepsia based on the Rome III criteria. PG - 2626-31 LID - 10.1038/ajg.2010.351 [doi] AB - OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and symptom pattern of pathologic esophageal acid reflux (PEAR) in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) using the Rome III criteria, and to explore the value of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) test in distinguishing the patients with and those without PEAR among FD patients. METHODS: Consecutive FD patients who fulfilled the Rome III criteria without predominant typical reflux symptoms (i.e., heartburn or regurgitation) were enrolled. All patients underwent upper endoscopy and an ambulatory 24-h pH monitoring. PEAR was defined as the percentage total time for which a pH value <4 was >4.2% in the distal esophagus. Then, patients were treated with rabeprazole 10 mg twice daily for 28 days. The symptom scores were measured by the frequency score multiplied by the severity scores of the predominant symptom before and at the end of the treatment, and the "PPI test" was defined as positive if the overall scores of the predominant dyspeptic symptom in the fourth week decreased by >50% compared with those of the baseline. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-six FD patients were enrolled, with predominant symptoms of epigastric pain (n=68), epigastric burning (n=47), bothersome postprandial fullness (n=54), and early satiation (n=17). The prevalence of PEAR was 31.7%, with the highest percentage (48.9%) in patients with epigastric burning as their predominant symptom. The prevalence of PEAR in patients with postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) and epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) were 36.6% (26/71) and 28.7% (33/115), respectively. Overall, 63.4% were positive for the "PPI test"; the rates were 51.5, 85.0, 66.7, and 41.1% in patients with epigastric pain, epigastric burning, bothersome postprandial fullness, and early satiation as their predominant symptoms, respectively (chi(2)=17.59, P=0.001). The positive rates were 65.5 and 60.6% in patients with PDS and EPS, respectively (chi(2)=0.41, P=0.522). The sensitivity and specificity of the "PPI test" in distinguishing FD patients with PEAR was 83.1 and 45.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PEAR is present in almost one third of FD patients; the prevalence is approximately 50% in those with epigastric burning. The "PPI test" has a limited value in distinguishing the FD patients with and those without PEAR. FAU - Xiao, Ying-Lian AU - Xiao YL AD - Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. FAU - Peng, Sui AU - Peng S FAU - Tao, Jin AU - Tao J FAU - Wang, An-Jiang AU - Wang AJ FAU - Lin, Jin-Kun AU - Lin JK FAU - Hu, Pin-Jin AU - Hu PJ FAU - Chen, Min-Hu AU - Chen MH LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20100907 PL - United States TA - Am J Gastroenterol JT - The American journal of gastroenterology JID - 0421030 RN - 0 (2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles) RN - 0 (Proton Pump Inhibitors) RN - 32828355LL (Rabeprazole) SB - IM CIN - Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Dec;105(12):2632-4. PMID: 21131930 CIN - Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jun;106(6):1168; author reply 1168-9. PMID: 21637272 MH - 2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/*therapeutic use MH - Adolescent MH - Adult MH - Aged MH - Chi-Square Distribution MH - Dyspepsia/classification/*drug therapy/*epidemiology/physiopathology MH - Esophageal pH Monitoring MH - Esophagoscopy MH - Female MH - Gastroesophageal Reflux/classification/*drug therapy/*epidemiology/physiopathology MH - Humans MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Prevalence MH - Proton Pump Inhibitors/*therapeutic use MH - Rabeprazole MH - Sensitivity and Specificity MH - Severity of Illness Index MH - Treatment Outcome EDAT- 2010/09/09 06:00 MHDA- 2011/01/20 06:00 CRDT- 2010/09/09 06:00 PHST- 2010/09/09 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2010/09/09 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2011/01/20 06:00 [medline] AID - ajg2010351 [pii] AID - 10.1038/ajg.2010.351 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Dec;105(12):2626-31. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.351. Epub 2010 Sep 7.