PMID- 21059030 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20110817 LR - 20131121 IP - 38 DP - 2010 Nov TI - Dietary energy source and physical conditioning affect insulin sensitivity and skeletal muscle glucose metabolism in horses. PG - 355-60 LID - 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00255.x [doi] AB - REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY: Starch rich (S) feeds reduce insulin sensitivity in untrained horses when compared to high fat (F) feeds, but insulin sensitivity is not affected when S or F are fed during exercise training. The effects of S vs. F on training-associated alterations in skeletal muscle glucose metabolism are unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of dietary energy source on training-associated changes in insulin sensitivity, skeletal muscle GLUT4 protein and hexokinase (HK) and glycogen synthase (GS) activities in horses. METHODS: After a baseline period on an all forage diet (Phase 1), horses were adapted to high starch (S) or high fat (F) diets (n = 7/group) for 6 weeks (Phase 2) and then completed 7 weeks of exercise training (Phase 3) on the same diets. To measure insulin sensitivity (SI), minimal model analysis of a frequently-sampled i.v. glucose tolerance test was performed at the end of each phase. Middle gluteal muscle biopsies to measure GLUT-4 protein content, muscle glycogen and HK and GS activities were taken before and after euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamps administered after each phase. Data were analysed by repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: In S, SI was 36% lower (P < 0.05) after Phase 2 when compared to Phase 1 but was unchanged in F. After Phase 3, SI was increased (P < 0.01) in S and F compared to Phase 2 and did not differ (P > 0.05) between diets. Middle gluteal muscle GLUT-4 protein and post clamp HK activity were increased (P < 0.05) in S after Phase 3, with higher (P < 0.01) GLUT4 in S than in F. GS activities were unchanged in both diets. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptation to S resulted in decreased SI mitigated by moderate physical conditioning. Increased GLUT-4 protein content and HK activity in S may have contributed to higher SI after training. CI - (c) 2010 EVJ Ltd. FAU - Stewart-Hunt, L AU - Stewart-Hunt L AD - Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. FAU - Pratt-Phillips, S AU - Pratt-Phillips S FAU - McCutcheon, L J AU - McCutcheon LJ FAU - Geor, R J AU - Geor RJ LA - eng PT - Journal Article PL - United States TA - Equine Vet J Suppl JT - Equine veterinary journal. Supplement JID - 9614088 RN - 0 (Dietary Carbohydrates) RN - 0 (Dietary Fats) RN - 0 (Glucose Transporter Type 4) RN - 0 (Insulin) RN - IY9XDZ35W2 (Glucose) SB - IM MH - Animal Feed/analysis MH - Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena MH - Animals MH - Diet/*veterinary MH - Dietary Carbohydrates/pharmacology MH - Dietary Fats/pharmacology MH - Female MH - Gene Expression Regulation MH - Glucose/*metabolism MH - Glucose Transporter Type 4/genetics/metabolism MH - Horses/*physiology MH - Insulin/*metabolism MH - Male MH - Muscle, Skeletal/drug effects/*metabolism MH - Physical Conditioning, Animal/*physiology EDAT- 2011/05/27 06:00 MHDA- 2011/08/19 06:00 CRDT- 2010/11/10 06:00 PHST- 2010/11/10 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2011/05/27 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2011/08/19 06:00 [medline] AID - 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00255.x [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Equine Vet J Suppl. 2010 Nov;(38):355-60. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00255.x.