PMID- 21195875 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20110201 LR - 20181201 IS - 1879-355X (Electronic) IS - 0360-3016 (Linking) VI - 79 IP - 2 DP - 2011 Feb 1 TI - Dose escalation improves cancer-related events at 10 years for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with hypofractionated high-dose-rate boost and external beam radiotherapy. PG - 363-70 LID - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.035 [doi] AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate the 10-year outcomes of intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with a prospective dose escalation hypofractionated trial of pelvic external beam radiation therapy (P-EBRT) with a high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1992 to 2007, 472 patients were treated with a HDR boost at William Beaumont Hospital. They had at least one of the following: a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of >10 ng/ml, a Gleason score of >/=7, or clinical stage >/=T2b. Patients received 46-Gy P-EBRT and an HDR boost. The HDR dose fractionation was divided into two dose levels. The prostate biologically equivalent dose (BED) low-dose-level group received <268 Gy, and the high-dose group received >268 Gy . Phoenix biochemical failure (BF) definition was used. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 8.2 years (range, 0.4-17 years). The 10-year biochemical failure rate of 43.1% vs. 18.9%, (p < 0.001), the clinical failure rate of 23.4% vs. 7.7%, (p < 0.001), and the distant metastasis of 12.4% vs. 5.7%, (p = 0.028) were all significantly better for the high-dose level group. On Cox multivariate analysis, higher BED levels (p = 0.017; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.586), pretreatment PSA assays (p < 0.001, HR = 1.022), and Gleason scores (p = 0.004) were significant variables for reduced biochemical failure. Higher dose levels (p, 0.002; HR, 0.397) and Gleason scores (p < 0.001) were significant for clinical failure. Grade 3 genitourinary complications were 2% and 3%, respectively, and grade 3 gastrointestinal complication was <0.5%. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective trial using P-EBRT with HDR boost and hypofractionated dose escalation demonstrates a strong dose-response relationship for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients. The improvement at 10 years for locoregional control with higher radiation doses (BED, > 268 Gy) has significantly decreased biochemical and clinical failures as well as distant metastasis. CI - Copyright A(c) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. FAU - Martinez, Alvaro A AU - Martinez AA AD - Radiation Oncology Department, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, USA. amartinez@beaumont.edu FAU - Gonzalez, Jose AU - Gonzalez J FAU - Ye, Hong AU - Ye H FAU - Ghilezan, Mihai AU - Ghilezan M FAU - Shetty, Sugandh AU - Shetty S FAU - Kernen, Kenneth AU - Kernen K FAU - Gustafson, Gary AU - Gustafson G FAU - Krauss, Daniel AU - Krauss D FAU - Vicini, Frank AU - Vicini F FAU - Kestin, Larry AU - Kestin L LA - eng PT - Clinical Trial, Phase II PT - Journal Article PL - United States TA - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys JT - International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics JID - 7603616 RN - 0 (Iridium Radioisotopes) RN - EC 3.4.21.77 (Prostate-Specific Antigen) SB - IM MH - Adult MH - Aged MH - Aged, 80 and over MH - Alpha Particles/therapeutic use MH - Beta Particles/therapeutic use MH - Brachytherapy/*methods MH - Dose Fractionation, Radiation MH - Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation MH - Follow-Up Studies MH - Humans MH - Iridium Radioisotopes/therapeutic use MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Multivariate Analysis MH - Prospective Studies MH - Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood MH - Prostatic Neoplasms/blood/drug therapy/pathology/*radiotherapy MH - Risk EDAT- 2011/01/05 06:00 MHDA- 2011/02/02 06:00 CRDT- 2011/01/04 06:00 PHST- 2009/08/26 00:00 [received] PHST- 2009/10/29 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2009/10/30 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2011/01/04 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2011/01/05 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2011/02/02 06:00 [medline] AID - S0360-3016(09)03428-2 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.035 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Feb 1;79(2):363-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.035.