PMID- 21384398 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20110711 LR - 20161125 IS - 1096-9101 (Electronic) IS - 0196-8092 (Linking) VI - 43 IP - 2 DP - 2011 Feb TI - Intense pulse light and 5-ALA PDT: phototoxic effects in vitro depend on the spectral overlap with protoporphyrine IX but do not match cut-off filter notations. PG - 176-82 LID - 10.1002/lsm.20970 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Successful photodynamic therapy (PDT) requires a light source by which light is absorbed by the photosensitizer. Such absorption is achieved by adapting the emission spectrum of the lamp to the absorption-spectrum of the photosensitizer. Intense pulsed light sources (IPLs) are widely used in dermatology, but a standardized protocol for IPL-PDT is not available. Five different IPLs were chosen to evaluate their efficacy for PDT in vitro and the possibility for developing a standard protocol for PDT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Emission-spectra of IPLs were measured with an optical spectrograph and compared with the absorption spectrum of protoporphyrine IX (PpIX). Keratinocytes were incubated with 5-ALA and illuminated with the IPLs. Cell viability was determined for radiant exposures ranging from 0 to 504 J/cm(2) and pulse durations from 8 to 100 milliseconds. A standard LED light source was used as a reference. RESULTS: Cell viability is less effectively reduced by 5-ALA-PDT with IPLs than by a LED light source. Radiant exposures of the five IPLs ranged between 80 and 311 J/cm(2) to achieve the EC(50) value. This value correlated with the spectral overlap of the respective IPL and the absorption-spectrum of PpIX but not with the cut-off filter notations supplied by the manufacturer. CONCLUSIONS: All IPLs assessed emit different spectra because of different filter technologies. Different radiant exposures (J/cm(2) ) were necessary to achieve a photodynamic effect with 5-ALA in vitro depending on these spectra similar to the photodynamic effect of the standard LED light source. IPLs may be applicable in clinical PDT but radiant exposure protocols must be separately evaluated for each single IPL despite similar cut-off filter specifications. Such protocols are highly important for clinical practice to avoid a potential mismatch of excitation wavelengths and to prevent photothermal side effects when light intensities of up to hundreds of W/cm(2) are applied. CI - Copyright (c) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc. FAU - Maisch, Tim AU - Maisch T AD - Department of Dermatology, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany. tim.maisch@klinik.uni-regensburg.de FAU - Moor, Anne C E AU - Moor AC FAU - Regensburger, Johannes AU - Regensburger J FAU - Ortland, Christoph AU - Ortland C FAU - Szeimies, Rolf-Markus AU - Szeimies RM FAU - Baumler, Wolfgang AU - Baumler W LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't PL - United States TA - Lasers Surg Med JT - Lasers in surgery and medicine JID - 8007168 RN - 0 (Photosensitizing Agents) RN - 0 (Protoporphyrins) RN - 88755TAZ87 (Aminolevulinic Acid) RN - C2K325S808 (protoporphyrin IX) SB - IM MH - Aminolevulinic Acid/*adverse effects MH - Cell Survival/drug effects MH - Clinical Protocols/standards MH - Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation MH - Humans MH - In Vitro Techniques MH - Keratinocytes/*drug effects MH - Light/*adverse effects MH - Photochemotherapy/*methods MH - Photosensitizing Agents/*adverse effects MH - *Protoporphyrins MH - Spectrum Analysis EDAT- 2011/03/09 06:00 MHDA- 2011/07/12 06:00 CRDT- 2011/03/09 06:00 PHST- 2011/03/09 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2011/03/09 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2011/07/12 06:00 [medline] AID - 10.1002/lsm.20970 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Lasers Surg Med. 2011 Feb;43(2):176-82. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20970.