PMID- 21511066 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20110922 LR - 20161125 IS - 1532-8430 (Electronic) IS - 0022-0736 (Linking) VI - 44 IP - 3 DP - 2011 May-Jun TI - Consideration of QRS complex in addition to ST-segment abnormalities in the estimated "risk region" during acute anterior myocardial infarction. PG - 370-6 LID - 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2011.01.004 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: The myocardial area at risk (MaR) has been estimated in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by using ST segment-based electrocardiographic (ECG) methods. As the process from ischemia to infarction progresses, the ST-segment deviation is typically replaced by QRS abnormalities causing a falsely low estimated total MaR if determined by using ST segment-based methods. The purpose of this study was to investigate if consideration of the abnormalities in the QRS complex, in addition to those in the ST segment, provides a more accurate estimated total MaR during anterior AMI than by considering the ST segment alone. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with acute anterior ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) received technetium Tc 99m-sestamibi before percutaneous coronary intervention. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was performed within 2 hours after treatment and was used as a criterion standard for the estimated total MaR. The ECG recorded at admission in the hospital was used for the ECG estimated total MaR. This included an ST-segment estimated ischemic component of the total MaR (Aldrich score) and an estimated infarcted component of the total MaR in the acute phase of AMI by QRS abnormalities (Selvester score). These scores were added for the combined ECG score. RESULTS: The ischemic component of the total MaR estimated by the Aldrich score alone had no statistically significant correlation with SPECT (r = 0.21, P = .32). The infarcted component of the total MaR estimated by the Selvester score showed a significant correlation with SPECT (r = 0.49, P = .01). Each score gave a significant underestimated total MaR measured by SPECT (P < .01). When the Aldrich and Selvester scores were combined, the correlation with SPECT was r = 0.47, P = .02. The combined score still underestimated the total MaR by SPECT (P < .01), though the difference was smaller in comparison to either method alone (P < .01). CONCLUSION: The ECG estimated total MaR was more accurate by taking both ST deviation and QRS abnormalities into account than by using either method alone. A new ECG method to determine the total MaR during acute coronary occlusion should consider both its ischemic and infarcted components. CI - Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. FAU - van Hellemond, Irene E G AU - van Hellemond IE AD - Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands. FAU - Bouwmeester, Sjoerd AU - Bouwmeester S FAU - Olson, Charles W AU - Olson CW FAU - Botker, Hans E AU - Botker HE FAU - Kaltoft, Anne K AU - Kaltoft AK FAU - Nielsen, Soren S AU - Nielsen SS FAU - Terkelsen, Christian J AU - Terkelsen CJ FAU - Maynard, Charles AU - Maynard C FAU - Andersen, Mads P AU - Andersen MP FAU - Gorgels, Anton P M AU - Gorgels AP FAU - Wagner, Galen S AU - Wagner GS LA - eng PT - Journal Article PL - United States TA - J Electrocardiol JT - Journal of electrocardiology JID - 0153605 RN - 0 (Radiopharmaceuticals) RN - 971Z4W1S09 (Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi) SB - IM MH - Aged MH - Aged, 80 and over MH - Electrocardiography/*methods MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Myocardial Infarction/*diagnostic imaging/*physiopathology MH - Radiopharmaceuticals MH - Reproducibility of Results MH - Risk Assessment MH - Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted MH - Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi MH - *Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon EDAT- 2011/04/23 06:00 MHDA- 2011/09/23 06:00 CRDT- 2011/04/23 06:00 PHST- 2010/08/11 00:00 [received] PHST- 2011/04/23 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2011/04/23 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2011/09/23 06:00 [medline] AID - S0022-0736(11)00005-7 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2011.01.004 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - J Electrocardiol. 2011 May-Jun;44(3):370-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2011.01.004.