PMID- 21856247 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20120910 LR - 20151119 IS - 1934-8150 (Electronic) IS - 1551-7411 (Linking) VI - 8 IP - 3 DP - 2012 May-Jun TI - Rurality and other factors associated with adherence to immunosuppressant medications in community-dwelling solid-organ transplant recipients. PG - 228-39 LID - 10.1016/j.sapharm.2011.04.001 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Data on immunosuppressant adherence of community-dwelling adult solid-organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) from rural populations in the United States are limited. Therefore, understanding the association of rurality and other factors of immunosuppressant adherence will help providers design and deliver patient-centered adherence enhancing interventions. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to examine factors associated with a previously validated 4-item Immunosuppressant Therapy Adherence Scale (ITAS) score in community-dwelling adult SOTRs who received a transplant from an academic center in the Midwestern United States. METHODS: For this observational study, cross-sectional survey data (patient demographic, medical condition, immunosuppressant therapy, and self-reported ITAS) received from adult SOTRs aged 19 years or older with other data from an academic transplant center's database were merged. Using multivariate logistic regression, significant SOTR characteristics associated with being adherent (ITAS score=12) versus nonadherent (ITAS score <12) were examined. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 30% (n=556/1827). Those SOTRs responding (n=556) had a kidney (48%), liver (47%), or other (4.5%) transplant. They were more likely to be 50- to 64-year olds (52%), men (55%), white (90%), metroresident (59%), with an annual income less than $55,000. The SOTRs were living with a transplant for 6.3 years (median), reported excellent-to-good health status (77%), and received different immunosuppressant regimens. More than half of the SOTRs (58%) were adherent. In multivariate analyses, compared with patients aged 65 years or older, younger patients, nonmetro rural- versus metroresident, and those having more (>/=6) versus less (<6) comorbidities were significantly less likely to report adherence. SOTRs receiving tacrolimus-based combination immunosuppressant versus tacrolimus alone were more likely to report adherence. CONCLUSIONS: When designing and delivering patient care-centered interventions including those that use technology to increase immunosuppressant adherence, providers need to consider rural residence besides other well-established patient factors (younger age, immunosuppressant drug, and comorbidities) of nonadherence. CI - Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. FAU - Sankaranarayanan, Jayashri AU - Sankaranarayanan J AD - Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-6045, USA. jsankara@unmc.edu FAU - Collier, Dean AU - Collier D FAU - Furasek, Anne AU - Furasek A FAU - Reardon, Tom AU - Reardon T FAU - Smith, Lynette M AU - Smith LM FAU - McCartan, Megan AU - McCartan M FAU - Langnas, Alan N AU - Langnas AN LA - eng PT - Journal Article PL - United States TA - Res Social Adm Pharm JT - Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP JID - 101231974 RN - 0 (Immunosuppressive Agents) SB - IM MH - Adult MH - Age Factors MH - Aged MH - *Community Pharmacy Services MH - Cross-Sectional Studies MH - Drug Therapy, Combination MH - Female MH - Graft Rejection/immunology/*prevention & control MH - Graft Survival/*drug effects MH - Health Care Surveys MH - *Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice MH - Humans MH - Immunosuppressive Agents/*therapeutic use MH - Logistic Models MH - Male MH - *Medication Adherence MH - Middle Aged MH - Midwestern United States MH - Odds Ratio MH - *Organ Transplantation/adverse effects MH - Residence Characteristics MH - Risk Assessment MH - Risk Factors MH - *Rural Health Services MH - Socioeconomic Factors MH - Surveys and Questionnaires MH - Treatment Outcome MH - Young Adult EDAT- 2011/08/23 06:00 MHDA- 2012/09/11 06:00 CRDT- 2011/08/23 06:00 PHST- 2011/02/27 00:00 [received] PHST- 2011/04/25 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2011/04/26 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2011/08/23 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2011/08/23 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2012/09/11 06:00 [medline] AID - S1551-7411(11)00046-5 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.sapharm.2011.04.001 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Res Social Adm Pharm. 2012 May-Jun;8(3):228-39. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2011.04.001.