PMID- 22306574 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20120416 LR - 20171116 IS - 1534-6080 (Electronic) IS - 0041-1337 (Linking) VI - 93 IP - 5 DP - 2012 Mar 15 TI - Effects of antibody induction on transplant outcomes in human leukocyte antigen zero-mismatch deceased donor kidney recipients. PG - 493-502 LID - 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182427fc3 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the impact of antibody induction on outcomes in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) 0-mismatched deceased donor kidney recipients. METHODS: Using the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network of Organ Sharing database as of November 2009, we identified 44,008 adult deceased donor kidney recipients who received primary kidney transplants alone between 2003 and 2008 (HLA 0 mismatch, n = 6274; >/= 1 mismatch, n=37,734; median follow-up: 834 days). The impact of induction (thymoglobulin, interleukin-2 receptor antagonists [IL-2RA], or alemtuzumab; vs. no induction) on rejection (initial hospitalization, 6 months, first year), death-censored graft failure, and mortality were analyzed using multivariate logistic and Cox regression in the two groups. The impact of individual agents on outcomes was further analyzed in 0-mismatch recipients. RESULTS: There was a decreased risk of rejection over the first 6 months for HLA 0-mismatch recipients of antibody induction (adjusted odds ratio=0.71, P=0.003), but this effect was not observed at 1 year; in comparison, induction was associated with a reduced risk of rejection over the first year for HLA-mismatched recipients (0.87, P<0.001). The use of thymoglobulin (0.72, P=0.02) and IL-2RA (0.67, P=0.004) was associated with a decreased risk of rejection compared with no-induction at 6 months but was not different at 1 year (thymoglobulin: 0.77, P=0.05; IL-2RA:0.81, P=0.11) in HLA 0-mismatched recipients. Induction was not associated with improved graft or patient survival in HLA 0-mismatch recipients. CONCLUSION: In HLA 0-mismatch deceased donor recipients, antibody induction was associated with a decreased risk of rejection at 6 months posttransplant. Its use did not improve graft and patient survival over the follow-up period. FAU - Kuo, Hung-Tien AU - Kuo HT AD - Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. FAU - Huang, Edmund AU - Huang E FAU - Emami, Sina AU - Emami S FAU - Pham, Phuong-Thu AU - Pham PT FAU - Wilkinson, Alan H AU - Wilkinson AH FAU - Danovitch, Gabriel M AU - Danovitch GM FAU - Bunnapradist, Suphamai AU - Bunnapradist S LA - eng GR - 231-00-0115/PHS HHS/United States PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. PL - United States TA - Transplantation JT - Transplantation JID - 0132144 RN - 0 (Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized) RN - 0 (Antilymphocyte Serum) RN - 0 (HLA Antigens) RN - 0 (Immunosuppressive Agents) RN - 0 (Receptors, Interleukin-2) RN - 3A189DH42V (Alemtuzumab) RN - D7RD81HE4W (thymoglobulin) SB - IM MH - Adolescent MH - Adult MH - Alemtuzumab MH - Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/*therapeutic use MH - Antilymphocyte Serum/*therapeutic use MH - Female MH - Graft Rejection/immunology/mortality/*prevention & control MH - Graft Survival/*drug effects MH - HLA Antigens/*immunology MH - *Histocompatibility MH - Histocompatibility Testing MH - Humans MH - Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use MH - Kaplan-Meier Estimate MH - Kidney Transplantation/*immunology/mortality MH - Logistic Models MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Multivariate Analysis MH - Odds Ratio MH - Proportional Hazards Models MH - Receptors, Interleukin-2/immunology MH - Registries MH - Retrospective Studies MH - Risk Assessment MH - Risk Factors MH - Time Factors MH - Tissue and Organ Procurement MH - Treatment Outcome MH - United States MH - Young Adult EDAT- 2012/02/07 06:00 MHDA- 2012/04/17 06:00 CRDT- 2012/02/07 06:00 PHST- 2012/02/07 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2012/02/07 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2012/04/17 06:00 [medline] AID - 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182427fc3 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Transplantation. 2012 Mar 15;93(5):493-502. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182427fc3.