PMID- 22324801 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20120719 LR - 20220409 IS - 1547-5646 (Electronic) IS - 1547-5646 (Linking) VI - 16 IP - 5 DP - 2012 May TI - Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance. PG - 471-8 LID - 10.3171/2012.1.SPINE11842 [doi] AB - OBJECT: Spine surgery outcome studies rely on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements to assess treatment effect, but the extent of improvement in the numerical scores of these questionnaires lacks a direct clinical meaning. Because of this, the concept of a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) has been used to measure the critical threshold needed to achieve clinically relevant treatment effectiveness. As utilization of spinal fusion has increased over the past decade, so has the incidence of same-level recurrent stenosis following index lumbar fusion, which commonly requires revision decompression and fusion. The MCID remains uninvestigated for any PROs in the setting of revision lumbar surgery for this pathology. METHODS: In 53 consecutive patients undergoing revision surgery for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis-associated back and leg pain, PRO measures of back and leg pain were assessed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively, using the visual analog scale for back pain (VAS-BP) and leg pain (VAS-LP), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Physical and Mental Component Summary categories of the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12 PCS and MCS) for quality of life, Zung Depression Scale (ZDS), and EuroQol-5D health survey (EQ-5D). Four established anchor-based MCID calculation methods were used to calculate MCID (average change; minimum detectable change; change difference; and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis) for 2 separate anchors (health transition index of the SF-36 and the satisfaction index). RESULTS: All patients were available for 2-year PRO assessment. Two years after surgery, a significant improvement was observed for all PROs assessed. The 4 MCID calculation methods generated a range of MCID values for each of the PROs (VAS-BP 2.2-6.0, VAS-LP 3.9-7.5, ODI 8.2-19.9, SF-12 PCS 2.5-12.1, SF-12 MCS 7.0-15.9, ZDS 3.0-18.6, and EQ-5D 0.29-0.52). Each patient answered synchronously for the 2 anchors, suggesting both of these anchors are equally appropriate and valid for this patient population. CONCLUSIONS: The same-level recurrent stenosis surgery-specific MCID is highly variable based on calculation technique. The "minimum detectable change" approach is the most appropriate method for calculation of MCIDs in this population because it was the only method to reliably provide a threshold above the 95% confidence interval of the unimproved cohort (greater than the measurement error). Based on this method, the MCID thresholds following neural decompression and fusion for symptomatic same-level recurrent stenosis are 2.2 points for VAS-BP, 5.0 points for VAS-LP, 8.2 points for ODI, 2.5 points for SF-12 PCS, 10.1 points for SF-12 MCS, 4.9 points for ZDS, and 0.39 QALYs for EQ-5D. FAU - Parker, Scott L AU - Parker SL AD - Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-8618, USA. scott.parker@vanderbilt.edu FAU - Mendenhall, Stephen K AU - Mendenhall SK FAU - Shau, David N AU - Shau DN FAU - Adogwa, Owoicho AU - Adogwa O FAU - Anderson, William N AU - Anderson WN FAU - Devin, Clinton J AU - Devin CJ FAU - McGirt, Matthew J AU - McGirt MJ LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20120210 PL - United States TA - J Neurosurg Spine JT - Journal of neurosurgery. Spine JID - 101223545 SB - IM MH - Adult MH - Aged MH - Cohort Studies MH - *Decompression, Surgical MH - *Disability Evaluation MH - Female MH - Health Surveys MH - Humans MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Pain/etiology/*prevention & control MH - Pain Measurement MH - *Quality of Life MH - Recurrence MH - Reoperation MH - Reproducibility of Results MH - *Spinal Fusion MH - Spinal Stenosis/complications/*surgery MH - Treatment Outcome EDAT- 2012/02/14 06:00 MHDA- 2012/07/20 06:00 CRDT- 2012/02/14 06:00 PHST- 2012/02/14 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2012/02/14 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2012/07/20 06:00 [medline] AID - 10.3171/2012.1.SPINE11842 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 May;16(5):471-8. doi: 10.3171/2012.1.SPINE11842. Epub 2012 Feb 10.