PMID- 22337079 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20140703 LR - 20211021 IS - 1095-8290 (Electronic) IS - 0305-7364 (Print) IS - 0305-7364 (Linking) VI - 109 IP - 5 DP - 2012 Apr TI - Combined use of leaf size and economics traits allows direct comparison of hydrophyte and terrestrial herbaceous adaptive strategies. PG - 1047-53 LID - 10.1093/aob/mcs021 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hydrophytes generally exhibit highly acquisitive leaf economics. However, a range of growth forms is evident, from small, free-floating and rapidly growing Lemniden to large, broad-leaved Nymphaeiden, denoting variability in adaptive strategies. Traits used to classify adaptive strategies in terrestrial species, such as canopy height, are not applicable to hydrophytes. We hypothesize that hydrophyte leaf size traits and economics exhibit sufficient overlap with terrestrial species to allow a common classification of plant functional types, sensu Grime's CSR theory. METHODS: Leaf morpho-functional traits were measured for 61 species from 47 water bodies in lowland continental, sub-alpine and alpine bioclimatic zones in southern Europe and compared against the full leaf economics spectrum and leaf size range of terrestrial herbs, and between hydrophyte growth forms. KEY RESULTS: Hydrophytes differed in the ranges and mean values of traits compared with herbs, but principal components analysis (PCA) demonstrated that both groups shared axes of trait variability: PCA1 encompassed size variation (area and mass), and PCA2 ranged from relatively dense, carbon-rich leaves to nitrogen-rich leaves of high specific leaf area (SLA). Most growth forms exhibited trait syndromes directly equivalent to herbs classified as R adapted, although Nymphaeiden ranged between C and SR adaptation. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the hypothesis that hydrophyte adaptive strategy variation reflects fundamental trade-offs in economics and size that govern all plants, and that hydrophyte adaptive strategies can be directly compared with terrestrial species by combining leaf economics and size traits. FAU - Pierce, Simon AU - Pierce S AD - Department of Plant Production, University of Milan, Via G. Celoria 2, Milan, Italy. simon.pierce@unimi.it FAU - Brusa, Guido AU - Brusa G FAU - Sartori, Matteo AU - Sartori M FAU - Cerabolini, Bruno E L AU - Cerabolini BE LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't DEP - 20120214 PL - England TA - Ann Bot JT - Annals of botany JID - 0372347 RN - 059QF0KO0R (Water) RN - 7440-44-0 (Carbon) RN - N762921K75 (Nitrogen) SB - IM MH - Adaptation, Physiological/*physiology MH - Carbon/metabolism MH - Ecosystem MH - Embryophyta/anatomy & histology/growth & development/physiology MH - Nitrogen/metabolism MH - Phenotype MH - Photosynthesis/physiology MH - Plant Development MH - Plant Leaves/*anatomy & histology/growth & development/*physiology MH - *Plant Physiological Phenomena MH - Plants/*anatomy & histology MH - Water PMC - PMC3310502 EDAT- 2012/02/18 06:00 MHDA- 2014/07/06 06:00 PMCR- 2013/04/01 CRDT- 2012/02/17 06:00 PHST- 2012/02/17 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2012/02/18 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2014/07/06 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2013/04/01 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - mcs021 [pii] AID - 10.1093/aob/mcs021 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Ann Bot. 2012 Apr;109(5):1047-53. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs021. Epub 2012 Feb 14.