PMID- 22348312
OWN - NLM
STAT- MEDLINE
DCOM- 20130328
LR  - 20190918
IS  - 1475-2727 (Electronic)
IS  - 1368-9800 (Linking)
VI  - 15
IP  - 7
DP  - 2012 Jul
TI  - Design aspects of 24 h recall assessments may affect the estimates of protein and 
      potassium intake in dietary surveys.
PG  - 1196-200
LID - 10.1017/S1368980012000511 [doi]
AB  - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of different modes of administration 
      (face-to-face v. telephone), recall days (first v. second), days of the week 
      (weekday v. weekend) and interview days (1 d later v. 2 d later) on bias in 
      protein and K intakes collected with 24 h dietary recalls (24-HDR). DESIGN: Two 
      non-consecutive 24-HDR (collected with standardised EPIC-Soft software) were used 
      to estimate protein and K intakes by a face-to-face interview at the research 
      centres and a telephone interview, and included all days of the week. Two 24 h 
      urine collections were used to determine biomarkers of protein and K intake. The 
      bias in intake was defined as the ratio between the 24-HDR estimate and the 
      biomarker. SETTING: Five centres in Belgium, Czech Republic, France, the 
      Netherlands and Norway in the European Food Consumption Validation (EFCOVAL) 
      study. SUBJECTS: About 120 adults (aged 45-65 years) per centre. RESULTS: The 
      bias in protein intake in the Czech Republic and Norway was smaller for telephone 
      than face-to-face interviews (P = 0.01). The second 24-HDR estimates of protein 
      intake in France and K intake in Belgium had a larger bias than the first 24-HDR 
      (P = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively). In the Czech Republic, protein intake 
      estimated during weekends and K intake estimated during weekdays had a larger 
      bias than during other days of the week (P = 0.01). In addition, K intake 
      collected 2 d later in the Czech Republic was likely to be overestimated. 
      CONCLUSIONS: The biases in protein and K intakes were comparable between modes of 
      administration, recall days, days of the week and interview days in some, but not 
      all, study centres.
FAU - Crispim, Sandra P
AU  - Crispim SP
AD  - Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Bomenweg 2, Wageningen, The 
      Netherlands. sandracrispim@gmail.com
FAU - Geelen, Anouk
AU  - Geelen A
FAU - Siebelink, Els
AU  - Siebelink E
FAU - Huybrechts, Inge
AU  - Huybrechts I
FAU - Lillegaard, Inger T L
AU  - Lillegaard IT
FAU - Margaritis, Irene
AU  - Margaritis I
FAU - Rehurkova, Irena
AU  - Rehurkova I
FAU - Slimani, Nadia
AU  - Slimani N
FAU - Ocke, Marga C
AU  - Ocke MC
FAU - de Boer, Evelien
AU  - de Boer E
FAU - van't Veer, Pieter
AU  - van't Veer P
FAU - de Vries, Jeanne H M
AU  - de Vries JH
CN  - EFCOVAL Consortium
LA  - eng
PT  - Journal Article
PT  - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
DEP - 20120221
PL  - England
TA  - Public Health Nutr
JT  - Public health nutrition
JID - 9808463
RN  - 0 (Dietary Proteins)
RN  - 0 (Potassium, Dietary)
SB  - IM
MH  - Aged
MH  - Belgium
MH  - Bias
MH  - Czech Republic
MH  - Diet
MH  - Diet Records
MH  - *Diet Surveys
MH  - Dietary Proteins/*administration & dosage
MH  - France
MH  - Humans
MH  - *Mental Recall
MH  - Middle Aged
MH  - Netherlands
MH  - Norway
MH  - Potassium, Dietary/*administration & dosage
MH  - Reproducibility of Results
MH  - Software
MH  - Telephone
EDAT- 2012/02/22 06:00
MHDA- 2013/03/30 06:00
CRDT- 2012/02/22 06:00
PHST- 2012/02/22 06:00 [entrez]
PHST- 2012/02/22 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2013/03/30 06:00 [medline]
AID - S1368980012000511 [pii]
AID - 10.1017/S1368980012000511 [doi]
PST - ppublish
SO  - Public Health Nutr. 2012 Jul;15(7):1196-200. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012000511. Epub 
      2012 Feb 21.