PMID- 22410034 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20120801 LR - 20191210 IS - 1873-2623 (Electronic) IS - 0041-1345 (Linking) VI - 44 IP - 2 DP - 2012 Mar TI - Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing liver transplantation: validity of a third-generation device. PG - 424-8 LID - 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.12.036 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic monitoring is essential to a successful liver transplantation procedure. FloTrac, a hemodynamic monitor that uses arterial-waveform-based pulse contour analysis for cardiac output (CO) measurement, has proven useful in many clinical settings. One of the primary foci of FloTrac's recent third-generation software upgrade was improving its accuracy in low systemic vascular resistance status. We evaluated the accuracy of the upgraded FloTrac monitor during liver transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients undergoing liver transplantation were enrolled in the study. Two sets of CO were measured with a radial arterial line connected to a FloTrac monitor (COFT) and a pulmonary artery catheter connected to a continuous cardiac output Vigilence monitor (COPAC). Simultaneous CO measurement was performed and recorded every 5 minutes throughout the surgery. Bland-Altman analysis was used to estimate the accuracy. The comparative method and reference method were considered interchangeable if the limits of agreement did not exceed a threshold set a priori at the greater of +/-1 L/min, or a percentage error of lesser than 30%. RESULTS: In all, 3234 paired data were collected. The bias was -0.8 L/min and the limits of agreements were -5.6 to 4.0 L/min. Percentage error was 75%. Regression analysis of the systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) and the bias between COPAC and COFT showed that the bias was inversely related to the SVRI [r2=0.49; P<.001, y=-32.1983+9.9978 Log(x)]. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a software upgrade, the effectiveness of the FloTrac artery-derived cardiac output monitor for CO measurement during liver transplantation remains limited. CI - Copyright A(c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. FAU - Su, B C AU - Su BC AD - Department of Anesthesia, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou, and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Kwei-Shan Taoyuan, Taiwan. FAU - Tsai, Y F AU - Tsai YF FAU - Chen, C Y AU - Chen CY FAU - Yu, H P AU - Yu HP FAU - Yang, M W AU - Yang MW FAU - Lee, W C AU - Lee WC FAU - Lin, C C AU - Lin CC LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article PT - Validation Study PL - United States TA - Transplant Proc JT - Transplantation proceedings JID - 0243532 SB - IM MH - Adult MH - Aged MH - Bias MH - *Blood Pressure MH - *Blood Pressure Monitors MH - *Cardiac Output MH - Catheterization, Swan-Ganz MH - Equipment Design MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Liver Cirrhosis/physiopathology/*surgery MH - *Liver Transplantation MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Monitoring, Intraoperative/*instrumentation MH - Predictive Value of Tests MH - *Radial Artery MH - Regression Analysis MH - Reproducibility of Results MH - Software MH - Taiwan MH - Time Factors MH - Vascular Resistance EDAT- 2012/03/14 06:00 MHDA- 2012/08/02 06:00 CRDT- 2012/03/14 06:00 PHST- 2012/03/14 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2012/03/14 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2012/08/02 06:00 [medline] AID - S0041-1345(11)01698-8 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.12.036 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Transplant Proc. 2012 Mar;44(2):424-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.12.036.