PMID- 22545856
OWN - NLM
STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE
LR  - 20211021
IS  - 1939-0599 (Electronic)
IS  - 0012-1649 (Print)
IS  - 0012-1649 (Linking)
VI  - 48
IP  - 3
DP  - 2012 May
TI  - Disentangling similarity judgments from pragmatic judgments: Response to Sloutsky 
      and Fisher (2012).
PG  - 901-6
AB  - Sloutsky and Fisher (2012) attempt to reframe the results presented in Noles and 
      Gelman (2012) as a pure replication of their original work validating the 
      similarity, induction, naming, and categorization (SINC) model. However, their 
      critique fails to engage with the central findings reported in Noles and Gelman, 
      and their reanalysis fails to examine the key comparison of theoretical interest. 
      In addition to responding to the points raised in Sloutsky and Fisher's (2012) 
      critique, we elaborate on the pragmatic factors and methodological flaws present 
      in Sloutsky and Fisher (2004) that biased children's similarity judgments. Our 
      careful replication of that study suggests that, rather than measuring the 
      influence of labels on judgments of perceptual similarity, the original design 
      measured sensitivity to the pragmatics of task demands. Together, the results 
      reported in Noles and Gelman and the methodological problems highlighted here 
      represent a serious challenge to the validity of the SINC model specifically and 
      the words-as-features view more generally. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 
      APA, all rights reserved).
FAU - Noles, Nicholaus S
AU  - Noles NS
AD  - Department of Psychology.
FAU - Gelman, Susan A
AU  - Gelman SA
LA  - eng
GR  - R01 HD036043/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
GR  - R01 HD036043-12/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
GR  - R56 HD036043/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
PT  - Journal Article
PL  - United States
TA  - Dev Psychol
JT  - Developmental psychology
JID - 0260564
PMC - PMC3342029
MID - NIHMS359126
EDAT- 2012/05/02 06:00
MHDA- 2012/05/02 06:01
PMCR- 2013/05/01
CRDT- 2012/05/02 06:00
PHST- 2012/05/02 06:00 [entrez]
PHST- 2012/05/02 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2012/05/02 06:01 [medline]
PHST- 2013/05/01 00:00 [pmc-release]
AID - 2012-11363-010 [pii]
AID - 10.1037/a0027831 [doi]
PST - ppublish
SO  - Dev Psychol. 2012 May;48(3):901-6. doi: 10.1037/a0027831.