PMID- 22731835 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20130502 LR - 20151119 IS - 1365-2230 (Electronic) IS - 0307-6938 (Linking) VI - 37 IP - 8 DP - 2012 Dec TI - Application of fluorescence in situ hybridization as a diagnostic tool in melanocytic lesions, using paraffin wax-embedded tissues and imprint-cytology specimens. PG - 838-43 LID - 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2012.04416.x [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Accurate histopathological diagnosis of certain melanocytic skin lesions as benign or malignant can be notoriously difficult. Recently, four-colour fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has emerged as an important tool for classifying these lesions. AIM: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a melanoma FISH probe kit for accurate diagnosis of melanocytic tumours, and to validate its use with imprint-cytology specimens from the cut surface of tumours. METHODS: In total, 50 melanocytic skin lesions (31 malignant melanomas, 10 benign melanocytic naevi, and 9 histologically challenging benign melanocytic skin lesions) were evaluated. The samples comprise 47 tissue specimens embedded in paraffin wax, and three imprint-cytology specimens from the cut surface of melanomas. FISH was performed using four locus-specific identifier probes [Ras responsive element binding protein (RREB)1, myeloblastosis viral oncogene homologue (MYB), cyclin (CCN)D1 and centromere of chromosome (CEP)6], and results were compared with the clinical long-term follow-up and histopathological diagnosis data. RESULTS: The melanoma FISH probe distinguished between naevi and melanomas with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 94.1%. The most sensitive criterion was a gain in 6p25 (RREB1), seen in 100% of cases, followed by CEP6-related MYB loss (48.1%), CCND1 gain (37%) and MYB gain (22.2%). More than three-quarters (77.8%) of melanomas were positive for two or more criteria. Positive FISH results were also obtained for the imprint-cytology specimens. CONCLUSIONS: FISH is a valuable diagnostic tool for differentiating between benign and malignant melanocytic lesions, providing a high degree of sensitivity and specificity. The probes displayed exceptional discriminative capacity in difficult or ambiguous lesions. To our knowledge, his is the first reported use of imprint-cytology specimens for FISH diagnosis. CI - (c) The Author(s). CED (c) 2012 British Association of Dermatologists. FAU - Abasolo, A AU - Abasolo A AD - Department of Pathology, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain. FAU - Vargas, M T AU - Vargas MT FAU - Rios-Martin, J J AU - Rios-Martin JJ FAU - Trigo, I AU - Trigo I FAU - Arjona, A AU - Arjona A FAU - Gonzalez-Campora, R AU - Gonzalez-Campora R LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20120625 PL - England TA - Clin Exp Dermatol JT - Clinical and experimental dermatology JID - 7606847 RN - 0 (DNA Probes) RN - 0 (DNA-Binding Proteins) RN - 0 (RREB1 protein, human) RN - 0 (Transcription Factors) SB - IM MH - Adolescent MH - Adult MH - Aged MH - Aged, 80 and over MH - Child MH - Child, Preschool MH - Cytological Techniques/*methods MH - DNA Probes MH - DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics MH - Female MH - Humans MH - In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/*methods MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Nevus, Pigmented/*diagnosis MH - Paraffin Embedding MH - Sensitivity and Specificity MH - Skin Neoplasms/*diagnosis MH - Transcription Factors MH - Young Adult EDAT- 2012/06/27 06:00 MHDA- 2013/05/03 06:00 CRDT- 2012/06/27 06:00 PHST- 2012/06/27 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2012/06/27 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2013/05/03 06:00 [medline] AID - 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2012.04416.x [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Clin Exp Dermatol. 2012 Dec;37(8):838-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2012.04416.x. Epub 2012 Jun 25.