PMID- 22742552 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20120914 LR - 20220330 IS - 1543-2165 (Electronic) IS - 0003-9985 (Linking) VI - 136 IP - 7 DP - 2012 Jul TI - Comparison of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization methodologies for detection of echinoderm microtubule-associated proteinlike 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma: implications for optimal clinical testing. PG - 796-803 LID - 10.5858/arpa.2011-0321-OA [doi] AB - CONTEXT: Echinoderm microtubule-associated proteinlike 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK) gene fusions are detected in 3% to 13% of non-small cell lung carcinomas. Accurate testing for detection of EML4-ALK fusions is essential for appropriate therapy selection. OBJECTIVE: To compare reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) methodologies for detection of EML4-ALK fusions. DESIGN: Forty-six pulmonary adenocarcinomas were selected with enrichment for wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status (wild type, n = 42; mutant, n = 4). Specimens were tested by IHC (Dako; clone ALK1), FISH (Abbott Molecular; LSI ALK break apart), and RT-PCR (variants 1 and 3a/b). RESULTS: EML4-ALK variant 3a/b was detectable by RT-PCR, FISH, and IHC in 4% (2 of 46) of specimens. Complete agreement among FISH and IHC reviewers was obtained for variant 3a/b. No concordance existed among methodologies for the detection of EML4-ALK variant 1. The RT-PCR method detected variant 1 in 20% (9 of 46) of specimens. Agreement among FISH viewers was poor for variant 1 because only 11% (1/9) of specimens were scored as positive by all 3 viewers. The sensitivity of IHC for detection of variant 1 was also poor because only 1 of 9 samples (11%) was scored as positive. Overall, the frequency of EML4-ALK variants 1 and 3a/b was 24% (11 of 46) in adenocarcinomas enriched for wild-type EGFR status. One EML4-ALK variant 1 fusion was found to coexist with an EGFR exon 21 mutation. CONCLUSIONS: The FISH interpretation demonstrated great variability among observers. The RT-PCR method was the most sensitive and least-subjective methodology for detection of EML4-ALK fusions. FAU - Wallander, Michelle L AU - Wallander ML AD - Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. FAU - Geiersbach, Katherine B AU - Geiersbach KB FAU - Tripp, Sheryl R AU - Tripp SR FAU - Layfield, Lester J AU - Layfield LJ LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article PL - United States TA - Arch Pathol Lab Med JT - Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine JID - 7607091 RN - 0 (Cell Cycle Proteins) RN - 0 (Microtubule-Associated Proteins) RN - 0 (Oncogene Proteins, Fusion) RN - EC 2.7.10.1 (ALK protein, human) RN - EC 2.7.10.1 (Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase) RN - EC 2.7.10.1 (Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases) RN - EC 3.4.21.- (EML4 protein, human) RN - EC 3.4.21.- (Serine Endopeptidases) SB - IM MH - Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase MH - Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/*diagnosis/genetics/metabolism/pathology MH - Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics/*metabolism MH - Cell Line, Tumor MH - Humans MH - Immunohistochemistry/*methods MH - In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/*methods MH - Lung Neoplasms/*diagnosis/genetics/metabolism/pathology MH - Microtubule-Associated Proteins/genetics/*metabolism MH - Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics/*metabolism MH - Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics/*metabolism MH - Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/*methods MH - Sensitivity and Specificity MH - Serine Endopeptidases/genetics/*metabolism EDAT- 2012/06/30 06:00 MHDA- 2012/09/15 06:00 CRDT- 2012/06/30 06:00 PHST- 2012/06/30 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2012/06/30 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2012/09/15 06:00 [medline] AID - 10.5858/arpa.2011-0321-OA [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012 Jul;136(7):796-803. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0321-OA.