PMID- 23025302
OWN - NLM
STAT- MEDLINE
DCOM- 20140219
LR  - 20220125
IS  - 1930-7810 (Electronic)
IS  - 0278-6133 (Linking)
VI  - 32
IP  - 10
DP  - 2013 Oct
TI  - Spouses' attempts to regulate day-to-day dietary adherence among patients with 
      type 2 diabetes.
PG  - 1029-37
LID - 10.1037/a0030018 [doi]
AB  - OBJECTIVE: To investigate daily dietary adherence and diabetes-specific distress 
      among older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as a function of spouses' 
      diet-related support and diet-related control (persuasion and pressure) and 
      whether these daily processes differ among couples who do and do not appraise 
      responsibility for managing T2DM as shared. METHODS: End-of-day diaries were 
      completed by 126 couples in which one partner had T2DM (patient) and the other 
      did not (spouse). Using electronic diary methods, each partner independently 
      recorded data for 24 consecutive days (patients recorded their day's dietary 
      adherence and diabetes-specific distress; spouses recorded their day's 
      involvement in patients' dietary management). To assess dietary adherence, 
      patients reported the extent to which they followed dietary recommendations that 
      day with items from the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Measure. To 
      assess diabetes-specific distress, patients reported the extent to which they 
      worried about diabetes that day using items from the Problem Areas in Diabetes 
      (PAID) scale. RESULTS: Multilevel modeling revealed that, relative to the prior 
      day, spouses' diet-related support was associated with increases in patients' 
      adherence whereas diet-related persuasion and pressure were associated with 
      decreases in adherence; spouses' pressure was associated with increases in 
      patients' diabetes-specific distress. When partners appraised responsibility for 
      managing T2DM as shared, support was associated with decreases in 
      diabetes-specific distress; pressure was associated with decreases in adherence. 
      CONCLUSIONS: Our findings offer insight into partners' day-to-day disease-related 
      interactions and identify those that are likely to be beneficial versus 
      detrimental for patients' physical and psychological health.
CI  - (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).
FAU - Stephens, Mary Ann Parris
AU  - Stephens MA
AD  - Department of Psychology, Kent State University.
FAU - Franks, Melissa M
AU  - Franks MM
FAU - Rook, Karen S
AU  - Rook KS
FAU - Iida, Masumi
AU  - Iida M
FAU - Hemphill, Rachel C
AU  - Hemphill RC
FAU - Salem, James K
AU  - Salem JK
LA  - eng
GR  - R01 AG024833/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
PT  - Journal Article
DEP - 20121001
PL  - United States
TA  - Health Psychol
JT  - Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, 
      American Psychological Association
JID - 8211523
SB  - IM
MH  - Aged
MH  - Aged, 80 and over
MH  - Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/*diet therapy/psychology
MH  - *Diet
MH  - Family Characteristics
MH  - Female
MH  - Humans
MH  - Interpersonal Relations
MH  - Male
MH  - Middle Aged
MH  - Multilevel Analysis
MH  - *Patient Compliance
MH  - *Persuasive Communication
MH  - Self Care
MH  - Social Support
MH  - Spouses/*psychology
EDAT- 2012/10/03 06:00
MHDA- 2014/02/20 06:00
CRDT- 2012/10/03 06:00
PHST- 2012/10/03 06:00 [entrez]
PHST- 2012/10/03 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2014/02/20 06:00 [medline]
AID - 2012-26681-001 [pii]
AID - 10.1037/a0030018 [doi]
PST - ppublish
SO  - Health Psychol. 2013 Oct;32(10):1029-37. doi: 10.1037/a0030018. Epub 2012 Oct 1.