PMID- 23137504 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20130107 LR - 20121109 IS - 1097-6744 (Electronic) IS - 0002-8703 (Linking) VI - 164 IP - 5 DP - 2012 Nov TI - Randomized controlled trial comparing simultaneous versus optimized sequential interventricular stimulation during cardiac resynchronization therapy. PG - 735-41 LID - S0002-8703(12)00526-1 [pii] LID - 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.07.026 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality and improves symptoms in patients with systolic heart failure (HF) and ventricular dyssynchrony. This randomized, double-blind, controlled study evaluated whether optimizing the interventricular stimulating interval (V-V) to sequentially activate the ventricles is clinically better than simultaneous V-V stimulation during CRT. METHODS: Patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) III or IV HF, meeting both CRT and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indications, randomly received either simultaneous CRT or CRT with optimized V-V settings for 6 months. Patients also underwent echocardiography-guided atrioventricular delay optimization to maximize left ventricular filling. The V-V optimization involved minimizing the left ventricular septal to posterior wall motion delay during CRT. The primary objective was to demonstrate noninferiority using a clinical composite end point that included mortality, HF hospitalization, NYHA functional class, and patient global assessment. Secondary end points included changes in NYHA classification, 6-minute hall walk distance, quality of life, peak VO(2), and event-free survival. RESULTS: The composite score improved in 75 (64.7%) of 116 simultaneous patients and in 92 (75.4%) of 122 optimized patients (P < .001, for noninferiority). A prespecified test of superiority showed that more optimized patients improved (P = .03). New York Heart Association functional class improved in 58.0% of simultaneous patients versus 75.0% of optimized patients (P = .01). No significant differences in exercise capacity, quality of life, peak VO(2), or HF-related event rate between the 2 groups were observed. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate modest clinical benefit with optimized sequential V-V stimulation during CRT in patients with NYHA class III and IV HF. Optimizing V-V timing may provide an additional tool for increasing the proportion of patients who respond to CRT. CI - Copyright (c) 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. FAU - Abraham, William T AU - Abraham WT AD - The Ohio State University Heart Center, Columbus, OH 43210-1252, USA. william.abraham@osumc.edu FAU - Leon, Angel R AU - Leon AR FAU - St John Sutton, Martin G AU - St John Sutton MG FAU - Keteyian, Steven J AU - Keteyian SJ FAU - Fieberg, Ann M AU - Fieberg AM FAU - Chinchoy, Ed AU - Chinchoy E FAU - Haas, Garrie AU - Haas G LA - eng SI - ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00271232 PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article PT - Randomized Controlled Trial PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't DEP - 20121002 PL - United States TA - Am Heart J JT - American heart journal JID - 0370465 SB - IM MH - Adult MH - Aged MH - Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/*methods MH - *Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy MH - Disease-Free Survival MH - Double-Blind Method MH - Echocardiography MH - Female MH - Heart Ventricles MH - Humans MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Prospective Studies MH - Quality of Life MH - Severity of Illness Index MH - Treatment Outcome MH - Walking EDAT- 2012/11/10 06:00 MHDA- 2013/01/08 06:00 CRDT- 2012/11/10 06:00 PHST- 2008/04/13 00:00 [received] PHST- 2012/07/10 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2012/11/10 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2012/11/10 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2013/01/08 06:00 [medline] AID - S0002-8703(12)00526-1 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.07.026 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Am Heart J. 2012 Nov;164(5):735-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.07.026. Epub 2012 Oct 2.