PMID- 23177724 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20140224 LR - 20151119 IS - 1873-6513 (Electronic) IS - 0885-3924 (Linking) VI - 46 IP - 2 DP - 2013 Aug TI - Minimal clinically important differences in the Edmonton symptom assessment system in patients with advanced cancer. PG - 192-200 LID - S0885-3924(12)00494-0 [pii] LID - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.022 [doi] AB - CONTEXT: Longitudinal symptom monitoring is important in the setting of patients with advanced cancer. Scores over time may naturally fluctuate, although a patient may feel the same. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the minimal levels of change required to be clinically relevant (minimal clinically important difference [MCID]) using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). METHODS: Between 1999 and 2009, patients completed the ESAS before palliative radiotherapy and at follow-up. MCIDs were calculated using both the anchor- and distribution-based methods for improvement and deterioration; 95% confidence intervals for the differences in mean change scores between adjacent categories also were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 276 patients completed the ESAS at baseline and during at least one follow-up visit. At the four-week follow-up, decrease of 1.2 and 1.1 units in pain and depression scales, respectively, constituted clinically relevant improvement, whereas increase of at least 1.4, 1.8, 1.1, 1.1, and 1.4 units, respectively, in pain, tiredness, depression, anxiety, and appetite loss items were required for deterioration. At the subsequent follow-ups, these values were similar. Overall, the MCID for improvement tended to be smaller than that for deterioration. The distribution-based method estimates tended to be larger than the 0.3 SD estimates, but closer to the 0.5 SD estimates. CONCLUSION: MCIDs allow health care professionals to determine the success of treatment in improving the patient's quality of life. MCIDs may prompt health care professionals to intervene with new treatment. Future studies should confirm our findings with a variety of anchors. CI - Copyright (c) 2013 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. FAU - Bedard, Gillian AU - Bedard G AD - Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. FAU - Zeng, Liang AU - Zeng L FAU - Zhang, Liying AU - Zhang L FAU - Lauzon, Natalie AU - Lauzon N FAU - Holden, Lori AU - Holden L FAU - Tsao, May AU - Tsao M FAU - Danjoux, Cyril AU - Danjoux C FAU - Barnes, Elizabeth AU - Barnes E FAU - Sahgal, Arjun AU - Sahgal A FAU - Poon, Michael AU - Poon M FAU - Chow, Edward AU - Chow E LA - eng PT - Clinical Trial PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't DEP - 20121122 PL - United States TA - J Pain Symptom Manage JT - Journal of pain and symptom management JID - 8605836 SB - IM CIN - J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Mar;45(3):e4-5. PMID: 23465763 MH - Adult MH - Aged MH - Aged, 80 and over MH - Anxiety/diagnosis/epidemiology MH - Causality MH - Comorbidity MH - Fatigue/diagnosis/epidemiology MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Longitudinal Studies MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Neoplasms/*diagnosis/*epidemiology/*radiotherapy MH - Ontario/epidemiology MH - Pain/diagnosis/epidemiology MH - *Patient Outcome Assessment MH - Prevalence MH - *Quality of Life MH - Reproducibility of Results MH - Risk Factors MH - Sensitivity and Specificity MH - *Severity of Illness Index MH - *Surveys and Questionnaires OTO - NOTNLM OT - Edmonton Symptom Assessment System OT - Minimal clinically important difference OT - advanced cancer OT - palliative care EDAT- 2012/11/28 06:00 MHDA- 2014/02/25 06:00 CRDT- 2012/11/27 06:00 PHST- 2012/04/10 00:00 [received] PHST- 2012/07/31 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2012/08/01 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2012/11/27 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2012/11/28 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2014/02/25 06:00 [medline] AID - S0885-3924(12)00494-0 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.022 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Aug;46(2):192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.022. Epub 2012 Nov 22.