PMID- 23261095 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20130610 LR - 20121224 IS - 1097-6779 (Electronic) IS - 0016-5107 (Linking) VI - 77 IP - 1 DP - 2013 Jan TI - Diagnostic and therapeutic yield is not influenced by the timing of small-bowel enteroscopy: morning versus afternoon. PG - 62-70 LID - S0016-5107(12)02653-3 [pii] LID - 10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.032 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Small-bowel enteroscopies (BEs) are tedious and prolonged, and their efficacy may be affected by the timing of procedures. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the differences in diagnostic yield, insertion depth, procedure duration, therapeutic yield, and adverse events (AEs) of enteroscopies performed in the morning versus the afternoon. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent BE for suspected small-bowel disease at a single institution between January 2008 and August 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Differences in diagnostic yield, insertion depth, procedure duration, therapeutic yield, and AEs between morning (started before noon) and afternoon (after noon) procedures. RESULTS: A total of 250 enteroscopies were performed on 250 patients, of which 125 patients (50%) underwent a procedure in the morning and 125 patients (50%) underwent the procedure in the afternoon. The diagnostic yield with anterograde enteroscopy was the same in both the morning and afternoon (63.7% and 63.7%, respectively; P = .99). The procedure durations were also similar (42.4 +/- 21.5 minutes vs 46.2 +/- 22.4 minutes, respectively; P = .25). Similarly the diagnostic yield with retrograde enteroscopy was similar in morning and afternoon (44.1% and 35.3%, respectively; P = .46). However, the procedure durations of retrograde BE were significantly shorter in the morning compared with the afternoon (51.3 +/- 21.3 minutes vs 66.6 +/- 32.9 minutes, respectively; P = .03). Therapeutic yield and AEs were similar. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: The timing of procedure, morning versus afternoon, did not affect the diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy of BE in patients with suspected small-bowel disease. CI - Copyright (c) 2013 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. FAU - Sanaka, Madhusudhan R AU - Sanaka MR AD - Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. sanakam@ccf.org FAU - Navaneethan, Udayakumar AU - Navaneethan U FAU - Upchurch, Bennie R AU - Upchurch BR FAU - Lopez, Rocio AU - Lopez R FAU - Vannoy, Sabrina AU - Vannoy S FAU - Dodig, Milan AU - Dodig M FAU - Santisi, Janice M AU - Santisi JM FAU - Vargo, John J AU - Vargo JJ LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article PL - United States TA - Gastrointest Endosc JT - Gastrointestinal endoscopy JID - 0010505 SB - IM MH - Cohort Studies MH - *Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/adverse effects/methods MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Intestinal Diseases/diagnosis/surgery MH - Intestine, Small MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Retrospective Studies MH - Time MH - Time Factors EDAT- 2012/12/25 06:00 MHDA- 2013/06/12 06:00 CRDT- 2012/12/25 06:00 PHST- 2012/07/02 00:00 [received] PHST- 2012/08/27 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2012/12/25 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2012/12/25 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2013/06/12 06:00 [medline] AID - S0016-5107(12)02653-3 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.032 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jan;77(1):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.032.