PMID- 23455908
OWN - NLM
STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE
DCOM- 20130909
LR  - 20181023
IS  - 1520-8532 (Electronic)
IS  - 1084-7529 (Linking)
VI  - 29
IP  - 12
DP  - 2012 Dec 1
TI  - Two models for partially coherent imaging.
PG  - 2591-7
LID - 10.1364/JOSAA.29.002591 [doi]
AB  - This paper discusses the physical difference between two image formation 
      approaches for partially coherent imaging. In one approach, the pupil function is 
      shifted according to illumination condition as in the transmission cross 
      coefficient (TCC) approach, whereas in the other approach, the object spectrum is 
      shifted. Although the two approaches result in identical images, they are built 
      on distinct physical models. Eigenfunction analysis reveals that the TCC approach 
      is built on an artificial optical model only for image calculation. Therefore, 
      the two approaches are not interchangeable except for image calculation. Such an 
      example is found in calculating the entropy in an imaging system.
FAU - Yamazoe, Kenji
AU  - Yamazoe K
AD  - Canon Inc., 23-10, Kiyohara-Kogyo-danchi, Utsunomiya, Tochigi 321-3298, Japan. 
      kyamazoe@cusa.canon.com
LA  - eng
PT  - Journal Article
PL  - United States
TA  - J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis
JT  - Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision
JID - 9800943
EDAT- 2013/03/05 06:00
MHDA- 2013/03/05 06:01
CRDT- 2013/03/05 06:00
PHST- 2013/03/05 06:00 [entrez]
PHST- 2013/03/05 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2013/03/05 06:01 [medline]
AID - 246216 [pii]
AID - 10.1364/JOSAA.29.002591 [doi]
PST - ppublish
SO  - J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2012 Dec 1;29(12):2591-7. doi: 
      10.1364/JOSAA.29.002591.