PMID- 23577700 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20150330 LR - 20220330 IS - 1742-4755 (Electronic) IS - 1742-4755 (Linking) VI - 10 DP - 2013 Apr 12 TI - Antenatal care packages with reduced visits and perinatal mortality: a secondary analysis of the WHO Antenatal Care Trial. PG - 19 LID - 10.1186/1742-4755-10-19 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: In 2001, the WHO Antenatal Care Trial (WHOACT) concluded that an antenatal care package of evidence-based screening, therapeutic interventions and education across four antenatal visits for low-risk women was not inferior to standard antenatal care and may reduce cost. However, an updated Cochrane review in 2010 identified an increased risk of perinatal mortality of borderline statistical significance in three cluster-randomized trials (including the WHOACT) in developing countries. We conducted a secondary analysis of the WHOACT data to determine the relationship between the reduced visits, goal-oriented antenatal care package and perinatal mortality. METHODS: Exploratory analyses were conducted to assess the effect of baseline risk and timing of perinatal death. Women were stratified by baseline risk to assess differences between intervention and control groups. We used linear modeling and Poisson regression to determine the relative risk of fetal death, neonatal death and perinatal mortality by gestational age. RESULTS: 12,568 women attended the 27 intervention clinics and 11,958 women attended the 26 control clinics. 6,160 women were high risk and 18,365 women were low risk. There were 161 fetal deaths (1.4%) in the intervention group compared to 119 fetal deaths in the control group (1.1%) with an increased overall adjusted relative risk of fetal death (Adjusted RR 1.27; 95% CI 1.03, 1.58). This was attributable to an increased relative risk of fetal death between 32 and 36 weeks of gestation (Adjusted RR 2.24; 95% CI 1.42, 3.53) which was statistically significant for high and low risk groups. CONCLUSION: It is plausible the increased risk of fetal death between 32 and 36 weeks gestation could be due to reduced number of visits, however heterogeneity in study populations or differences in quality of care and timing of visits could also be playing a role. Monitoring maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes when implementing antenatal care protocols is essential. Implementing reduced visit antenatal care packages demands careful monitoring of maternal and perinatal outcomes, especially fetal death. FAU - Vogel, Joshua P AU - Vogel JP FAU - Habib, Ndema Abu AU - Habib NA FAU - Souza, Joao Paulo AU - Souza JP FAU - Gulmezoglu, A Metin AU - Gulmezoglu AM FAU - Dowswell, Therese AU - Dowswell T FAU - Carroli, Guillermo AU - Carroli G FAU - Baaqeel, Hassan S AU - Baaqeel HS FAU - Lumbiganon, Pisake AU - Lumbiganon P FAU - Piaggio, Gilda AU - Piaggio G FAU - Oladapo, Olufemi T AU - Oladapo OT LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Randomized Controlled Trial PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't DEP - 20130412 PL - England TA - Reprod Health JT - Reproductive health JID - 101224380 SB - IM MH - Adult MH - Female MH - Gestational Age MH - Humans MH - Infant, Newborn MH - Office Visits/*statistics & numerical data MH - *Perinatal Mortality MH - Pregnancy MH - Pregnancy Outcome MH - Prenatal Care/*standards/*statistics & numerical data MH - Program Evaluation MH - World Health Organization PMC - PMC3637102 EDAT- 2013/04/13 06:00 MHDA- 2015/03/31 06:00 PMCR- 2013/04/12 CRDT- 2013/04/13 06:00 PHST- 2013/01/30 00:00 [received] PHST- 2013/02/18 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2013/04/13 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2013/04/13 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2015/03/31 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2013/04/12 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 1742-4755-10-19 [pii] AID - 10.1186/1742-4755-10-19 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Reprod Health. 2013 Apr 12;10:19. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-19.